| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Ken, I seriously question whether the constituency
for an 802.10 project would be greater than for an 802.1 project. Security experts have evolved with the
market, and are now coming off 802.11i and not from 802.10. Reviving a hibernating project is
increasing our administrative effort without any benefit. 802.1 meetings are open and public and have
further demonstrated through the LinkSec meetings so
far that they are able to draw the necessary experienced participants from the
industry that are required for the SQ to achieve its goals. Answering the urgency for providing a
solution for EPON is not justification for reviving 802.10. Fragmenting the
effort between multiple groups is the sure way to sink the project. Ariel P.S. As a LinkSec
participant and contributor, I am very much against the reuse of SDE. I believe
there is no benefit in reusing a protocol that had no wide acceptance and
proved no market feasibility. Ariel Maislos Passave Inc. ariel.maislos@passave.com (408) 530 0458 -----Original Message----- Dan- Do you Yahoo!? |