Re: Agenda Items for next meeting
Mike and all,
We would like to book some time in the agenda to present
the CAP message format and some ring fail scenarios.
From the last meeting, we will probably need 2 hours for
the presentation.
Thanks,
Allan Pepper and Harry Peng
Mike Takefman wrote:
>
> People,
>
> Time to remind people of work they agreed to do for
> the next meeting.
>
> As stated at the interim, we will be meeting during the
> Plenary in La Jolla. I've been allocated rooms on
> the 11th, 12th and 13th. Not sure we need all days,
> but I'm guessing we'll need at least 2.
>
> Khaled has begun work on the simulation framework for
> evaluating MAC algorithms.
>
> B.J. and Nader are going to present on support for
> 802 architecture and features.
>
> Both Lantern and Luminous had indicated that they
> would be able to share their vision of an RPR or
> at least what is important to them in an RPR.
>
> Anyone else is of course welcome to do so as well.
>
> Jason is going to give a report on the SCI and how
> it may or may not relate to an RPR
>
> Howard is going to talk about how patent issues were
> handled in earlier project authorization requests.
>
> I'm going to learn more about the procedural processes
> and provide a presentation on them.
>
> I'm hoping to get another customer to come out and
> talk what is important to them in an RPR (to them).
>
> I'm hoping Nortel will be able to provide a brief
> presentation showing some of the detail of their
> packet format etc.
>
> Then we have to continue with drafting the PAR and
> 5 criteria documents.
>
> please email me or the reflector to let me know if
> you will be presenting and how long to slot into
> the agenda.
>
> thanks for the patience,
>
> mike