RE: Draft Press Release for 802.17 formation
Mike,
Attached is the file with my comments. As you've requested, I've used change
marks. Here is the explanation for what I did and why.
1) I have de-emphasized the "new physical layer" stuff. I believe that our
intention is to use exiting stuff where possible. Frankly, I would have
dropped "developing new ones" at all, as I believe we won't need these, but
as long as it's there, I prefer to reword.
2.I've changed the order of "demands" a bit just to make it more logical
(i.e. "all efforts aim at reducing costs"......).
I believe the two mods are fairly minor.
Cheers
Offer Pazy
Sr. Product Manager
Native Networks
15 Gonen St.
Petah Tikva 49170
Israel
Tel: +972 3 921-0010 Ext. 229
Fax: +972 3 921-0080
pazy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pazy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://www.nativenetworks.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-rprsg@xxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-stds-802-rprsg@xxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Mike Takefman
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 08:03
To: stds-802-rprsg@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Draft Press Release for 802.17 formation
Please read the following draft that I wrote during the SEC
meeting. Comments and changes should be replied to on the
reflector. I suggest that people turn on changes and use
strikethrough so that changes are obvious.
I want to close this within a week so that I can forward
to the SEC so that they can vote and so that we can
get it to the IEEE staff for release after the NESCOM
meeting.
thanks,
mike