Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
I vote yes with one editorial comment for
consideration.
I am not advocating that we do or do not add
"Carriers" to the press release. I would ask those more familiar with our
likely customer base to consider what the press will consider to be the
important area of play for RPR. If their point of view is that this is a
technology that will gain widest acceptance amongst carriers, than we should
play that trump card. If you believe that they will not be, or should not
be focused on RPR as a technology for carriers, then we should probably leave
the word out.
Raj, my primary concern is that if the press
release is too generic we will miss the opportunityh of focusing the press on
RPR's real value, and we will get less mileage out of the release.
I vote yes in either case, and am willing to leave
it open to Mike to use whatever process he wants in deciding if the word goes
in.
Best regards,
Robert D. Love
President, LAN Connect Consultants 7105 Leveret Circle Raleigh, NC 27615 Phone: 919 848-6773 Mobile: 919 810-7816 email: rdlove@xxxxxxxx Fax: 720 222-0900
|