| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
All,
As some of you may remember, Harry brought up a
good point/suggestion.
He suggested taht we should find ways of developing
performance models to compare various mechanisms or approaches to perform
certain functions as opposed to models to compare complete implementations. His
point was that we want to be able to understand the merits of each approach for
handling a certain function and then use whichever parts of each function that
we like.
This sounds like a nice approach, but certainly
much harder to develop.
Any suggestions on how to get this done?
Should be develop some very basic generic model
that has open/blank blocks for various functions and plug in function mechanisms
as needed?
In this case the big challenge would be to come up
with something that is generic enough to allow all proposed mechanisms to fit
in.
Any thoughts on this or other ideas?
Khaled Amer
President, AmerNet Inc. Architecture Analysis and Performance Modeling Specialists Address: 13711 Solitaire Way, Irvine, CA 92620 Phone: (949)552-1114 Fax: (949)552-1116 e-mail: khaledamer@xxxxxxx Web: www.performancemodeling.com |