Re: [rprsg] URGENT: Agenda almost ready
Offer,
sorry for the delay in replying.
The primary output of the march meeting will be
two things.
1) Terms and definitions that will end up going
into the standard, but also serve as a level
set to insure when we are voting on objectives we
all are agreeing (or disagreeing) about the same
thing.
2) Some (or perhaps all) objectives for the RPRWG.
These will end up in an document for the WG.
Now, at the last meeting we requested that people
start sending email to the reflector on either of
the above as to stimulate discussion.
Perhaps there will be some in the next 2 weeks, if
not we do it all at the meeting.
cheers,
mike
Offer Pazy wrote:
>
> Mike,
>
> Although not directly related to the agenda, there is something missing from
> our planning for the March meeting: "What is the expected output of this
> meeting?" That is, I can gather from the topics below where we'll hopefully
> make progress, but it would be better if we can try to commit to more
> concrete and deliverable (as our managers always like us to commit) goals.
> If there was a metric for consensus, I would aim at achieving something like
> that. But in its absence, how about a "good draft of objectives document"?
>
> Offer Pazy
> Sr. Product Manager
> Native Networks
> 15 Gonen St.
> Petah Tikva 49170
> Israel
> Tel: +972 3 921-0010 Ext. 229
> Fax: +972 3 921-0080
> pazy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pazy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> http://www.nativenetworks.com
>
> The Native Way = Ethernet Simplicity + SONET Reliability
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stds-802-rprsg@xxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-stds-802-rprsg@xxxxxxxx]On
> Behalf Of Mike Takefman
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 07:29
> To: stds-802-rprsg@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: [rprsg] URGENT: Agenda almost ready
>
> People,
>
> I've got a preliminary agenda pulled together, but
> it is really tight. Here is the rough view,
> we work from 8 am to 6 pm each day.
>
> Monday AM Parallel sessions
> - Performance Ad-Hoc
> - Introduction to RPR for new antendees
>
> Monday Afternoon
> - administrivia
> - end-user presentations
>
> Tuesday
> - Overall Scope / Objectives / Requirements
> - Resiliency Objectives
> - Interoperability Requirements
>
> Wednesday
> - Bandwidth Management
> - Simulation Results
> - Action Items from previous meetings
>
> Thursday
> - Perf Adhoc Report
> - Voting Rights Administration
> - Election of Officers
> - Motions on Objectives
> - Planning the next meeting
>
> I've had to cut people's presentations a little
> to include time for questions. This will force people
> to be concise :) I.E. a 30 minute presention is
> 24 minutes to talk and 6 minutes of questions.
>
> I would like schedule a meeting on tuesday
> night so that I can open up the schedule a
> little (allow for more discussion).
>
> Right now there are not many tutorials scheduled
> so I think we will not conflict at all.
>
> I was thinking of a session from 8pm to 10:30pm.
>
> Please respond to the reflector with your
> thoughts on whether this is a good or bad idea.
>
> I will send out the current schedule to all
> presenters tonight to make sure that I did not
> miss anyone. If you did not see a message from
> me with a pdf of the schedule then I missed you
> so yell.
>
> thanks,
>
> mike
>
> --
> Michael Takefman tak@xxxxxxxxx
> Manager HW Engineering, Cisco Systems
> Chair IEEE 802.17 Stds WG
> 2000 Innovation Dr, Ottawa, Canada, K2K 3E8
> voice: 613-271-3399 fax: 613-271-4867
--
Michael Takefman tak@xxxxxxxxx
Manager HW Engineering, Cisco Systems
Chair IEEE 802.17 Stds WG
2000 Innovation Dr, Ottawa, Canada, K2K 3E8
voice: 613-271-3399 fax: 613-271-4867