Re: [802SEC] Five day approval process
Mike,
I do not understand your response.
At this point, I request that Mat and/or Paul rule on whether what you want
to do is valid. If the 802 Chair or Vice Chair states the document was approved
in a valid manner then I have no problem with the content.
Regards,
Jerry Upton
In a message dated 9/21/2005 1:09:03 PM Central Standard Time,
mjlynch@nortel.com writes:
Jerry,
I see where this is going. Block voting to block the document.
Obviously we need to clarify the status of wireless groups who choose to
meet away from a joint interim. Some hold the view that having the
non-technical regulatory group meet with regulators is useful. The enabling
motions used in the past in .18 were allowed - now they are not.
Are you making a motion to block the input? If so then it seems logical that
an email ballot of the EC is needed.
Regards,
Mike
+1 972 814 4901
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry1upton@aol.com [mailto:Jerry1upton@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 13:02
To: Lynch, Michael [RICH1:2H50:EXCH]; STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [802SEC] Five day approval process
Mike,
I assume by your answer that quorum was not present when the document was
approved. Therefore my point is the same. I disapprove and I do not believe
this document has valid approval to move forward.
How many voters were present when the document was approved?
Regards,
Jerry
In a message dated 9/21/2005 12:24:02 PM Central Standard Time,
mjlynch@nortel.com writes:
Jerry,
As I responded to Carl, we had an enabling motion from the July Plenary to
conduct business without an interim. I'll be happy to provide that to you.
As I understand it that is how my predecessor was able to conduct business
at an interim meeting.
Since there seems to be a precedent, and those who have participate in .18
under the previous chair felt that we had met the same requirement, I
presume that .18 was able to function normally at an interim.
Regards,
Mike
+1 972 814 4901
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry1upton@aol.com [mailto:Jerry1upton@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 09:31
To: Lynch, Michael [RICH1:2H50:EXCH]; STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [802SEC] Five day approval process
Mike,
Did 802.18 have quorum at the Interim this week?
If there was no quorum, I vote disapprove.
It is my understanding that all motions for approving documents or any other
official business conducted at an Interim without quorum requires a
reaffirmation vote at a Plenary. A TAG or Working Group cannot waive the
quorum requirement. The members cannot only approve work items for the
Interim or conference calls in advance that will need an affirmation vote
later. I believe Stuart clarified this for 802.11 members at the May interim
also.
However, you want a final ruling on this from Mat and Paul.
Regards,
Jerry Upton
In a message dated 9/19/2005 10:03:49 AM Central Standard Time,
mjlynch@NORTEL.COM writes:
Please find enclosed 802.18's comments in response to the European
Commission 2.6 GHz consultation. The comment period closes 15 September
but the membership believes it is beneficial to file a response. This
was approved by unanimous consent.
I would like to be able to forward this the European Commission on 25
September.
Regards,
Mike
+1 972 814 4901
<<18-05-0033-r0-0000-EC_2.6GHz_Band_Consultation Response.doc>>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This
list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.