Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] Agenda Proposal

Each PAR should stand on own.
The way you know it is noncontroversal is by vote.
Jon

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Rosdahl                 Engineer, Senior Staff
office: 801-492-4023      Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
cell:   801-376-6435      10871 North 5750 West
                                   Highland, UT 84003

A Job is only necessary to eat!
A Family is necessary to be happy!!

Sent from BlueMail
On Jul 13, 2017, at 2:30 PM, Geoff Thompson <thompson@ieee.org> wrote:
John-

I believe your criteria is not inclusive enough.

Additionally...
IF the PAR and its supporting material has not received comments (other than the trivial which have been fully addressed)
THEN it can go on the consent agenda.

Geoff


On Jul 13, 2017, at 5:12 AMPDT, John D'Ambrosia < jdambrosia@GMAIL.COM> wrote:

All,

Paul and I discussed different methods to further improve the effectiveness of our Closing meetings.

 

We came up with the following –

 

If a WG Chair has two or more PARs for approval, and these PARs are considered to be non-controversial as evident by a WG vote that has zero “NO” votes, one single motion could be used to approve these PARs for a given WG.  If an EC member had an issue with a grouping, then a modification of the agenda would be necessary.

 

Feedback?

 

John D’Ambrosia

Recording Secretary, IEEE 802 LMSC

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.