Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAX] [EXTERNAL] [STDS-802-11-TGAX] Updated comment spreadsheet



Hi Robert,


Thank you for updating the XLS.

 

I fixed for the motions you listed. Some of these are CIDs I just assigned to you and Liwen. :-o.

Yes – doc 1455 corresponding to motion 683 for the ones assigned to me

 

I believe that motion 706 was not run. Motion 711, with the same CIDs, adopted the resolutions from 18/1410r6.

That’s correct


Regards,
Abhi

 

From: *** 802.11 TGax - HEW - High Efficiency WLAN *** <STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Stacey, Robert
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 2:25 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAX] [EXTERNAL] [STDS-802-11-TGAX] Updated comment spreadsheet

 

Hi Abhi,

 

I fixed for the motions you listed. Some of these are CIDs I just assigned to you and Liwen. :-o.

 

I believe that motion 706 was not run. Motion 711, with the same CIDs, adopted the resolutions from 18/1410r6.

 

-Robert

 

 

From: Abhishek Patil [mailto:appatil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 1:52 PM
To: Stacey, Robert <robert.stacey@xxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [STDS-802-11-TGAX] Updated comment spreadsheet

 

Hi Robert,


I took a quick look at the XLS and noticed that it doesn’t include CIDs resolved in docs that have passed motion.

From my quick check, the following motions don’t appear in the XLS: 670, 683, 698, 700, 703, 704, 706


Regards,
Abhi

 

 

From: *** 802.11 TGax - HEW - High Efficiency WLAN *** <STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Stacey, Robert
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 12:55 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [STDS-802-11-TGAX] Updated comment spreadsheet

 

Hello All,

 

An updated comment spreadsheet is available here: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/18/11-18-1123-05-00ax-comments-on-tgax-d3-0.xlsx

 

This revision includes the approved resolutions from the September meeting.

 

There are around 300 comments that do not have and assignee. A lot of these are comments on definitions in 3.2 or other odd crevices in the spec. And one or two crevasses. Please take a look at these and see if they overlap any resolutions you are working on. Send me an email and I’ll assign them to you. Indicate the comment group (if one applies) as well.

 

Statistics as follows:

Technical and general comments with approved resolutions: 504

Technical and general comments with an assignee: 521

Technical and general comments without an assignee: 300

Editorials with resolution drafted: 697 (associated changes already present in D3.1)

Editorials awaiting resolution: 130

Marked as duplicate: 2

Total:  2154

 

Comments awaiting resolution by ad-hoc:

PHY: 100

MAC: 218

MU: 122

SR: 5

EDITOR: 208 assigned (editorials, 802.19, MIB, PICS, Submission Required) + 298 unassigned

 

 

-Robert

 

 

 


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1