Thanks,
Youhan.
Regarding the naming of "Standard power AP" (1) and "Indoor standard power AP" (4),
while it may well be the case that a number of regulatory bodies use this
term to mean "you need some kind of frequency coordination system",
this is by no means global.
For instance, my understanding is that currently at least CEPT has no
such category, and so no device operating in corresponding countries
would be a "Standard power AP" as currently described.
Standard-power
APs in CEPT countries would be low-power indoors/very low-power APs.
I repeat my suggestion that a more neutral term be used.
If there is a
need to tie this with terminology used in certain
regdoms then there
could be informative text to that effect (e.g. "NOTE—An AP with external
regulatory system [or whatever neutral term we come up with] is referred to as a
Standard Power AP in FCC, ACMA and Costa Rican regulatory domains.", or an informative
column in the table).
I note though that your discussion section
suggests "SP"s are in fact only allowed in the FCC regulatory domain.
As regards 1 v 3, my initial interpretation would be that
"an enabling signal (as defined by the regulatory rules) from an indoor AP or an indoor standard power AP"
is "control from an external system" and hence that
"operation requires control from an external system" overlaps with
"operation relies on being able to successfully receive an enabling signal (as defined by the regulatory rules) from an indoor AP or an
indoor standard power AP".
In other words, as currently described an "Indoor enabled AP"
is also a "Standard power AP".
Thanks,
Mark
--
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français
Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600
Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS Fax: +44 1223 434601
ROYAUME UNI WWW:
http://www.samsung.com/uk
From:
Youhan Kim <youhank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, 18 May 2021 22:26
To: Mark Rison <m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: 11-21/790 - 6 GHz comment resolution
Thank you, Mark.
I have uploaded r4 incorporating most of your feedback. Attached version is r4 with some notable response to you included.
Regards,
Youhan
From: Mark Rison <m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 3:04 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGM] 11-21/790 - 6 GHz comment resolution
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of
the organization.
Thanks for this, Youhan. I think it is going in the right direction.
I attach some comments.
Thanks,
Mark
--
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français
Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600
Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS Fax: +44 1223 434601
ROYAUME UNI WWW:
http://www.samsung.com/uk
From: Youhan Kim <youhank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, 17 May 2021 18:18
To: STDS-802-11-TGM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGM] 11-21/790 - 6 GHz comment resolution
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
Hi.
Thank you very much all for the discussion on 11-21/790 regarding resolutions for 6 GHz related comments during the 5/13/2021 TGme meeting.
I have uploaded r3 to the IEEE document server, addressing comments received during that meeting.
Please let me know if you have any other feedback.
Regards,
Youhan
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1