Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11] WUR MC-OOK Discussion continued

--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group Reflector ---
Hi Steve,

Thanks. Your recollection and the minutes seem to reflect that interpretation. I know that Joseph Levy took an action to prepare a contribution and I asked him to post a link on this thread when he has it ready so that we can get some offline review prior to the meeting. 

I'm hopeful that we can resolve this issue in May.

Thanks,

Mike

On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 11:25 AM Steve Shellhammer <sshellha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Mike,

 

                Thanks for the email.  Here are my thoughts on what the task group needs to do on this topic.

 

At the March IEEE meeting there was reasonably strong support (15/8/4) for the straw poll stating, “Should the specification use distinct terms for the implementation technique and for the over-the-air waveform?”

 

I believe the intent of that straw poll was to use the term “MC-OOK” for the implementation technique and the term “WUR-OOK” for the over-the-air waveform.

 

I believe the amendment currently specifies MC-OOK.  So, I believe the challenge now is to specify WUR-OOK.  One suggestion I heard (from Sean) is that WUR-OOK is specified by all the relevant shall statements currently in the amendment, like the spectral flatness, the correlation test, etc.

 

So far that is the only proposal I have hear for specifying WUR-OOK.   So, I think we need to consider that proposal and if other proposals are brought forth, we can consider those proposals also.

 

Specifying WUR-OOK seems to be the task that needs to be completed.

 

Regards,

Steve

 

From: M Montemurro <montemurro.michael@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2023 9:53 AM
To: STDS-802-11@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11] WUR MC-OOK Discussion continued

 

WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.

--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group Reflector ---

Hi everyone,

 

Just refreshing this thread and adding the WG reflector. 

 

So, we're good with the changes in the document posted above and I don't have to badger people? :-)

 

Cheers,

 

Mike

 

On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 5:19 PM M Montemurro <montemurro.michael@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi all,

 

During the March plenary in the Tuesday PM2 session, we discussed the WUR MC-OOK issues and seemed to reach a consensus on a way forward using document 11-22/1035r2 (https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/22/11-22-1035-02-000m-proposed-tgme-comment-resolution-cid-2346.docx) as a starting point. 

 

My plan is to schedule time to continue this discussion  and come to closure during Tuesday PM2 of the May Interim session.

 

I would appreciate if we could have a reflector discussion on the topic/document  prior to the May meeting so that we can maximize our face-to-face time and come to closure in May.

 

You can find the minutes from the March meeting here:

 

The latest version of Joe's document is posted here:

 

Thanks,

 

Mike

 

 

 

 

 

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11 list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11 list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11&A=1