Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[RPRWG] Could we discard old (often obsolete) comments?




Tom,

I would like to suggest that we discard unaddressed comments
(which were skipped due to lack of time) from draft 0.1 when
we move on to D0.2. Instead, can we let the owner of these
comments resubmit them with revised page, line, section, and
(if necessary) technical content?

On my last comments, I originally planned to just resubmit
them with revised page/line/section numbers. However, by the
time I reviewed them, the technical comments often changed.
Even when the technical content remained stable, it was easy
enough to cut-and-past the old comment into the new.

This would seem to save you some time, not having to deal
with old (and possibly no longer relevant) comments. Saving
the groups time would also be valuable. I'm the one that has
the most comments on record (and therefore most likely to
complain), and its my preference. So, hopefully no one else
would complain.

If this isn't possible, in general, can I request it be applied
to my comments in specific (it technically possible, of course).
I think discarding my D0.1 comments would allow for a more
effecient addressing of D0.2 comments. Any minor missed topics
will be a small percentage and (if any) can be addressed through
the next round of comments.

Thanks!
DVJ

BTW, John Lemon supplied the Frame sources for D0.2, so I don't
need them any more. However, it could help contributors (in general)
prepare drop-in text if these were generally available.


David V. James, PhD
Chief Architect
Network Processing Solutions
Data Communications Division
Cypress Semiconductor
110 Nortech Parkway
San Jose, CA 95134
Work: +1.408.942.2010
Cell: +1.650.954.6906
Fax:  +1.408.942.2099
Work: djz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Base: dvj@xxxxxxxxxxxx