RE: stds-80220-requirements: comments on rev5
I would like to make a comment on John's email of July 23rd on section 4.1.4
as follows.
I don't agree to eliminate this section (John said "stricken") because the
bandwidth is one of important basic system requirements. A system cannot be
specified without concrete values of bandwidth.
A broader bandwidth is a current trend of wireless communications, e.g.,
WLAN (e.g., 20MHz), UWB (e.g., >300MHz), possible systems beyond IMT-2000
(e.g., 100MHz) as well as a general requirement for Mobile "Broadband"
Wireless Access.
I also understand John's rationale to not limit the lower bound of the
bandwidth.
Therefore, how about to have several typical numbers for the bandwidth as
options in this section?
Best Regards,
Fujio
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fan John [mailto:J.Fan@flarion.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 6:15 PM
> To: 'stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org'
> Subject: stds-80220-requirements: comments on rev5
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> These are comments on rev5 of the document from Marc
> Goldberg, Michael Youssefmir, Samir Kapoor, Joanne Wilson,
> Arif Ansari and John Fan.
>
> --John
> 4.1.4. Channel Bandwidth
>
> Action: This section should be stricken.
>
> Rationale: The current text requires "multiples of 5 MHz" for
> deployment. No rationale for 5Mhz has been given on the
> reflector. Beyond that, a 5 MHz minimum bandwidth would
> limit the applicability of the MBWA AI in many of the
> available licensed bands below 3.5 GHz.
>