RE: [802.21] AW: [802.21] Tomorrow's Telecon material
Hi, Subir,
Sorry, due to some conflict, I could not attend today's meeting. Btw, I am not sure why we will need to have reliability in transport layer if reliability is already included as part of MIH protocol. I guess adding reliability at two different layers would make the protocol heavy weight. However, I do agree that
we may need to debate this little more before we can conclude anything.
Regards,
Ajoy
-----Original Message-----
From: Subir Das [mailto:subir@RESEARCH.TELCORDIA.COM]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 7:59 AM
To: STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [802.21] AW: [802.21] Tomorrow's Telecon material
Kalyan,
We are debating on this issue. Since we are discussing ACK in MIH protocol,
additional reliability requirement may not be necessary. However, we
need to
discuss it further.
regards,
-Subir
Kalyan Koora wrote:
>Hi Subir,
>
>just a quick comment, reliability is not put as an IS requirement
>on transport protocol. Is there any reason for this?
>
>regards,
>Kalyan
>
>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: Subir Das [mailto:subir@RESEARCH.TELCORDIA.COM]
>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2006 02:14
>An: STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
>Betreff: [802.21] Tomorrow's Telecon material
>
>
>Pl. find the document for tomorrow's telecon. We will discuss the
>slides. Also attaching
>a drafty draft. Folks are working on it. The IETF draft submission
>deadline is on March 6,
>9:00 EST. Hopefully we will have a stable version by then.
>
>Regards,
>-Subir
>
>