Re: [802.21] IETF Drafts
Srini,
Thanks for asking this. I would say # 2 is more appropriate at this moment
with minor modification.
2. Discussed and contains some feedback from IEEE 802.21 members
I would agree with you that we should represent 802.21 view and
seek for WG support. IMO, we need more work and participation
within 802.21 WG to make that happen.
regards,
-Subir
>
>In the current state, I would like to know exactly what to say with
>respect to carrying IEEE 802.21's message in the drafts in the March
>IETF meeting. I see three options.
>
>1. Entirely author's view (weak to no support)
>2. Discussed and contains feedback from IEEE 802.21 members (partial
>support)
>3. Agreed by 802.21 (support)
>
>I would like the WG to keep in mind that internet-drafts submitted by
>individuals are the only way to present work items into the IETF. For
>both 802.21 and IETF, these drafts hold more ground if they represent
>the 802.21 view.
>
>Regards,
>Srini
>
>