Re: [802.21] Issue 44
Yoshi/Vivek,
We already have a decision by the group on this (see LB comment 348),
which is:
"Create separate 802.21 list of networks. But for consistency use same
values as suggested by other standrad bodies."
This will be done in D01.09. The IETF assigned values will be used, but
there will be no reference to RADIUS because the group decision is to
remove the dependency on RADIUS.
regards,
-Qiaobing
Yoshihiro Ohba wrote:
> OK. I think we just need to have some text that refers to RFC 3575
> for the actual assignment policy. I'll write a contribution on that.
>
> Yoshihiro Ohba
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:19:58PM -0700, Gupta, Vivek G wrote:
>
>>Yoshi,
>>
>>You are right. But we probably need some text that needs to go into
>>draft addressing this. Once the text is available this can be closed.
>>
>>Best Regards
>>-Vivek
>>
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: stds-802-21@ieee.org [mailto:stds-802-21@ieee.org] On Behalf Of
>>>Yoshihiro Ohba
>>>Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 12:14 PM
>>>To: stds-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
>>>Subject: Issue 44
>>>
>>>Issue 44 "How are the 'link type' parameters lists updated" is marked
>>>as Open. However, I think this is not an issue any more after we
>>>decided to use IANA assigned values for link type. Or is there any
>>>issue here?
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Yoshihiro Ohba
>>
>>
>