RE: Issue 44
In general, as part of closing down all issues, we need normative text
that can be incorporated into the draft. Without that we cannot really
close the issue.
Best Regards
-Vivek
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yoshihiro Ohba [mailto:yohba@tari.toshiba.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 8:46 AM
> To: Gupta, Vivek G
> Cc: Yoshihiro Ohba; stds-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: Issue 44
>
> OK. I think we just need to have some text that refers to RFC 3575
> for the actual assignment policy. I'll write a contribution on that.
>
> Yoshihiro Ohba
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:19:58PM -0700, Gupta, Vivek G wrote:
> >
> > Yoshi,
> >
> > You are right. But we probably need some text that needs to go into
> > draft addressing this. Once the text is available this can be
closed.
> >
> > Best Regards
> > -Vivek
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: stds-802-21@ieee.org [mailto:stds-802-21@ieee.org] On Behalf
Of
> > > Yoshihiro Ohba
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 12:14 PM
> > > To: stds-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
> > > Subject: Issue 44
> > >
> > > Issue 44 "How are the 'link type' parameters lists updated" is
marked
> > > as Open. However, I think this is not an issue any more after we
> > > decided to use IANA assigned values for link type. Or is there
any
> > > issue here?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Yoshihiro Ohba
> >