Re: [802.21] Comment #47
Hi Eunah,
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 11:38:33AM +0900, Eunah Kim wrote:
> Hello Yoshi,
>
> How about IETF RFC 3753 "Mobility Related Terminology"?
> It could be a choice even if definions of those terms are a bit simple.
It is indeed good!
Thanks a lot,
Yoshihiro Ohba
>
> Regards,
> Eunah
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Yoshihiro Ohba
> To: STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 11:05 AM
> Subject: [802.21] Comment #47
>
>
>
> I am working with my collleague on LB#1 Comment #47 (terminlogogy
> issue about handover types).
>
> The resolution of the group suggests:
>
> "
> Use existing definitions from ITU-T or other references wherever applicable.
> Also consider defining mobile/network "initiated" type handovers as well.
> "
>
> But we could not find a ITU-T document that defines terms such as
> network-controlled/initiated mobile-controlled/initiated handover.
>
> If someone knows a pointer to an appropriate document that defines those
> terms, please let me know.
>
> Regards,
> Yoshihiro Ohba