Re: [802.21] [clancy@xxxxxxxxxx: [HOKEY] preauth discussion]
Yes, the guidelines would be very helpful for 802.21 SG and it
is good that Yoshi is actively involved in the HOKEY WG.
regards,
-Subir
Clint Chaplin wrote:
> If Hokey does indeed go down this particular path, the resulting
> guidelines/recommendations would be useful in guiding the work of
> 802.21, but that also means that 802.21 would probably have to develop
> the actual pre-authentication protocol, rather than just referring to
> an external specification.
>
> On 7/25/07, Yoshihiro Ohba <yohba@tari.toshiba.com> wrote:
>> FYI. The work would be important for Security SG in 802.21.
>>
>> Yoshihiro Ohba
>>
>>
>> ----- Forwarded message from Charles Clancy <clancy@cs.umd.edu> -----
>>
>> X-VirusChecked: Checked
>> X-Env-Sender: hokey-bounces@ietf.org
>> X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-94.messagelabs.com!1185396605!60176034!1
>> X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.12.11; banners=-,-,-
>> X-Originating-IP: [156.154.16.145]
>> X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=
>> From: Charles Clancy <clancy@cs.umd.edu>
>> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (Windows/20070716)
>> To: hokey@ietf.org
>> X-CSD-MailScanner-Information: Please email staff@cs.umd.edu for more
>> information
>> X-CSD-MailScanner: Found to be clean
>> X-CSD-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
>> score=-4.399, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80,
>> BAYES_00 -2.60)
>> X-CSD-MailScanner-From: clancy@cs.umd.edu
>> X-Spam-Status: No
>> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
>> X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c
>> Subject: [HOKEY] preauth discussion
>> X-BeenThere: hokey@ietf.org
>> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
>> List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <hokey.ietf.org>
>> List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>,
>> <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>> List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/hokey>
>> List-Post: <mailto:hokey@ietf.org>
>> List-Help: <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
>> List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>,
>> <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
>> X-UIDL: a;l"!9M`"!eh(!!B\,!!
>>
>> During the WG meeting, there seemed to be support for simply developing
>> recommendations for pre-authentication in the HOKEY working group, and
>> not an actual protocol. Tim agrees that this could be done without
>> modifying our deliverables or milestones, given the current charter
>> wording.
>>
>> Is there any objection to taking this route?
>>
>> Assuming we pursue this route, are there volunteers to work on a design
>> team for developing a -00 document on pre-authentication?
>>
>> Please respond by August 8th.
>>
>> --
>> t. charles clancy, ph.d. <> tcc@umd.edu <> eng.umd.edu/~tcc
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> HOKEY mailing list
>> HOKEY@ietf.org
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey
>>
>>
>> ----- End forwarded message -----
>>
>
>