[STDS-802-3-400G] 答复: [STDS-802-3-400G] Electrical Ad-Hoc Straw Poll

[Yang Zhiwei <yang.zhiwei2@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Andre,

I vote for option2,

Besides were mentioned by Ali, It seems that the  "eta_0" parameter is set to 0 in COM table of the presentation of mellitz_01b_042417_elect . I suggest the penalty from One-sided noise spectral density should be included though it will not take a significant effect for 10dB C2M channel empirically. 

Best Regards!

Yang Zhiwei

ZTE

å??å§?é?®ä»¶

å??件人ï¼? ï¼?aszczepanek@xxxxxxxxxï¼?;

�件人� �STDS-802-3-400G@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx�;

æ?¥ æ?? ï¼?2017å¹´04æ??26æ?¥ 19:40

主 � �[STDS-802-3-400G] Electrical Ad-Hoc Straw Poll

At todayâ??s P802.3bs Electrical Ad-Hoc meeting I announced we would have a straw poll on options for the C2M Insertion Loss equation based on discussion following the  presentation of mellitz_01b_042417_elect.

 

·       Option 1: Do nothing

·       Option 2:

â??       Change  â??The supported insertion loss budget is characterized by Equation (120Eâ??1) and illustrated in Figure 120Eâ??4. â??  to â??The recommended insertion loss budget is characterized by Equation (120Eâ??1) and illustrated in Figure 120Eâ??4. â??

â??       Add â??recommendedâ?? to the title of Figure 120E-4.

·       Option 3: Change the insertion loss equation to the equation given in Slide 14 â??Option Bâ?? of mellitz_01b_042417_elect.

·       Option 4: Implement the changes in both options 2 & 3 above.

 

Please send me an email specifying your preferred option (select only one).

-         Donâ??t get hung up on exact values. This is a straw poll, nothing is definitive â?? we just want to establish a direction for the group.

 

Regards

                 Andre Szczepanek (Electrical Ad Hoc chair)