|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
Thanks! The table reference in the extra bullet for 140.7.5 is fixed to point to Table 140-6 rather than Table 140-11. I believe pointing to a table is more appropriate than a “hard coded” value. I had intended to use Table 140-6 with it’s return loss value of 15.5 dB, but had inadvertently typed the wrong reference.
Similarly, I neglected to delete the extra copy of Table 140-8.
Both items are now addressed in the attached v3.
Slide 13 I think is wrong. You shouldn’t be pointing to Table 140-11 where the return loss is 27dB. I think it should say “The optical return loss is 15.5dB.”
With this change you can add me as a supporter.
Also I don’t know why you are repeating Table 140-8 with slight differences on slides 9 and 10. I’d suggest you delete the version on slide 9.
Thank you for your time and inputs this morning to review traverso_022217_3cd_adhoc in the ad hoc call. I have attached an updated revision. I believe it captures the essence of all the feedback I received. I will submit a comment against D1.2 per the summary bullet. I believe that the editor, Peter Stassar, may begin soliciting improved wording for a smoother Task Force meeting in Vancouver.