Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[802SEC] +++SEC EMAIL BALLOT+++ Ballot Result: FAIL-- Motion for WG Initial membership interpretation

Dear SEC members,

The ballot closed as of 9PM  April 29, 2003.   The ballot result is FAIL.  However, there are many DNVs (did not votes)--5-- in this email ballot, which makes me concerned I might have missed counting votes.  If I mistakenly did not count your vote, please notify me immediately.
Mat, Geoff, given this interpretation failed,  please review the comments on the ballots and consider submitting a new motion to resolve the DISS/DNVs.


 --Paul Nikolich

The vote tally as of the close of the ballot is as follows:

 Vote categories:         DIS    DNV    APP    ABS
 01 Geoff Thompson                          APP
 02 Mat Sherman                                APP
 03 Buzz Rigsbee                   DNV
 04 Bob O'Hara                       DNV
 05 Bill Quackenbush DIS
 06 Tony Jeffree           DIS
 07 Bob Grow                                      APP
 08 Stuart Kerry                        DNV
 00 Bob Heile                           DNV
 10 Roger Marks                                 APP
 11 Mike Takefman                             APP
 12 Carl Stevenson    DIS
 13 Jim Lansford                     DNV
                             total: -03-      -05-      -05-      -00-

 7 APPROVES required to PASS, 05 APPROVES received, ballot FAILS

----- Original Message -----
To: IEEE802
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 8:23 PM
Subject: [802SEC] +++SEC EMAIL BALLOT+++ Email Ballot: Motion for WG Initial membership interpretation

Dear SEC,

This is a 15 day SEC email ballot on a Motion to Interpret the LMSC P&P rule on Working Group Initial Membership as moved by Mat Sherman and seconded by Geoff Thompson.

The email ballot opens on Monday April 14, 2003 9PM EDT and closes Thursday April 29, 2003 9PM EDT.

Please direct your responses to the SEC reflector with a CC directly to me (


--Paul Nikolich

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 5:57 PM
Subject: Motion for WG Initial membership interpretation



I wish to formally make a motion concerning the interpretation of the current initial membership rules.  The motion I would like to make is as follows:




"Motion that until the P&P revision titled "WG membership" being balloted starting March 27th, 2003 is completed (estimated to occur at the end of the July 2003 IEEE 802 Plenary meeting) the line in the LMSC P&P section titled "Retention" reading:

’Membership is retained by participating in at least two of the last four Plenary session meetings.’

Should be interpreted as reading:

’Membership is retained by participating in at least two of the last four Plenary sessions. (An individual who attains membership by participation and attendance at the first meeting of a new Working Group is assumed to have the right to retain that membership by the granting of credit for 'full virtual attendance' at the plenary session that would be immediately previous to the first working group plenary session.)’”




Geoff Thompson helped develop this motion, and has agreed to second it.  Note that based on recent discussions it is somewhat different than the motion I said I would first make on the reflector.  This motion maximally protects the voting rights of initial members by ensuring retention of their rights through the first 4 plenary sessions.  We believe this is the motion that has the greatest chance of success.  If this fails, we may want make a second motion which we would want to complete before the end of the upcoming wireless interim session.  Since the motion is reasonably concise we would prefer a 15 day ballot period for this interpretation to allow time for a second round if needed.





Matthew Sherman
Vice Chair, IEEE 802
Technology Consultant
Communications Technology Research
AT&T Labs - Shannon Laboratory
Room B255, Building 103
180 Park Avenue
P.O. Box 971
Florham Park, NJ 07932-0971
Phone: +1 (973) 236-6925
Fax: +1 (973) 360-5877