Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] Current proposed Resolution for P&P Revision ballot titled "EC Membership and Meetings"



Mat -

At present, LMSC and Project 802 seem to be used interchangeably, which is not exactly an aid to the clarity of the document. If you feel that "Project 802" needs to be retained, then either:

- Lose LMSC as a term (probably not helpful, as it is much more common usage than Project 802 these days); or

- Mention up front that the terms "Prokject 802" and "LMSC" are one and the same thing, and that for clarity, LMSC is used in the document.

Regards,
Tony

At 23:11 20/02/2005, Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA) wrote:
Tony,
 
I remember the comment, but donít think we really discussed it.  I donít agree with the statement.  I think I tried to do this once before and was told that formally we are still ĎProject 802í.  Until someone like IEEE SA or IEEE CS tells me otherwise, I presume we are still Project 802.  If someone can provide evidence to the contrary Iíd love to hear it.  Iíd prefer to get rid of the term myself, but so far have not been successful.
 
Thanks,
 
Mat
 

Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
Senior Member Technical Staff
BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
Office: +1 973.633.6344
email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com

From: Tony Jeffree [mailto:tony@jeffree.co.uk]
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 6:05 PM
To: Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA)
Cc: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [802SEC] Current proposed Resolution for P&P Revision ballot titled "EC Membership and Meetings"
 
Mat -

I seem to recall someone mentioning during the telecon that "Project 802" is an outdated term that should be replaced (presumably by IEEE 802 LMSC, or just LMSC?). I notice that you didn't do a search & destroy on instances of Project 802 in the revised text.

Regards,
Tony

At 22:18 20/02/2005, Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA) wrote:


Folks,

Here is what I have so far for this ballot.  There has been so much editing that Iíve turned revís off to make it easier to read. You can turn revís on if you want to see the details.  Please comment if you see any errors.  7.1.2 is so complex that Iím inclined to do a complete rewrite of it.  However I want to make sure I complete the other two ballots first before I attempt it.  I will keep all the content.  I just want to organize the flow better to make things easier to read.

I do have one request of the LMSC Chair (Paul). We have put in partial descriptions of duties for some of the appointed positions.  Iíd like to finish the job and put in duties for all the appointed positions.  Could you provide a brief description of responsibilities for Recording Secretary, Executive Secretary, and Treasurer?

I am also waiting for Pat on a formal input on 7.1.5.1 item 7 (formerly item 8). Iíve seen some reflector debate, but I donít think weíve settled on a text yet.

Finally I will shortly be polling the EC for opposition on two sub issues, Member Emeriti and EC Telecons to see if I should divide the question on those two issues.

Thatís it for now.

Regards,

Mat

<<802.0-EC_Membership_&_Meetings-Proposed_ballot_resolution_r3.doc>>

Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.

Senior Member Technical Staff

BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR

Office: +1 973.633.6344

email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

Regards,
Tony
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

Regards,
Tony
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.