[802SEC] criteria for posting information to EC reflector

[Paul Nikolich <paul.nikolich@ATT.NET>]

 Dear EC Members,

 Roger has brought up an interesting issue with respect to whether or not it
 is appropriate to put the attachment with high level contract terms in
 Buzz's motion on the reflector.  I decided it was acceptable because the EC
 has had similar information from Buzz included in their minutes in the 
past.

 The larger question of exactly what is acceptable to post onto the 
reflector
 remains, however.  We don't have any crisp guidelines.  I would like to 
hear
 from the EC members on what they think is an appropriate set of guidelines
 on this topic, then I'll include it in the chair's guidelines document.

 To get the list started, in my opinion the following information should be
 kept private:

 a) final vendor contracts for review and approval (on the other hand, high
 level summary of terms and conditions are appropriate for posting)

b) any personal information (all reflector traffic should be strictly 802
 business related)

c) any information that has been explicitly deemed 'confidential and
 proprietary'

d) any information the EC has explicitly decided to be of 'executive
 privilege'

 Regards,

 --Paul

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.