[802SEC] RE: [802SEC] [802SEC] EC electronic ballot on 802.22 press release
I think it is nicer to those who managed to find the time to read the
pre-circulated document to provide a change mark-up so they can look at
just what changed from what they already reviewed. With the change
marked document, one can see the final document either by choosing
"Final" from the drop down menu in place of "Final Showing Markup" or by
hitting the "accept all changes" from the accept drop down.
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
On Behalf Of Roger B. Marks
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: [802SEC] [802SEC] EC electronic ballot on 802.22 press
If this were a recirc, I think it would be fine to send around a
marked-up copy for review.
However, in a new ballot, I think that the voters need to see a clean
copy. Otherwise, I think you introduce unnecessary ambiguity add make
the task of the voters unnecessarily complicated.
Since you had already distributed a preview copy, I understand why you
wanted to show markups. But, on principle, I think it is important that
the ballot group members see a clean copy and know that this is the
document they are voting to approve.
At 02:38 PM -0500 06/03/30, Carl R. Stevenson wrote:
>Paul has delegated it to me to conduct an EC electronic ballot on the
>approval of the attached proposed 802.22 press release.
>In response to my earlier motion, I received some editorial comments
>from Roger, which I appreciate and think add clarity, so I'm attaching
>version of the document which shows the changes that Roger suggested
>and I find acceptable and THAT is the version that's the subject of
>MOVE: That the EC approve the release of the attached press release on
>802.22's progress (document PR_P02_22V4r1.doc).
>Second: Shellhammer (Dr. Shellhammer has read the document - including
>the editorial changes in "r1" - and agreed to 2nd my motion.)
>INFORMATIONAL - this DRAFT press release accurately states the current
>status of 802.22 and points to the significant progress that 802.22 has
>achieved by going from 10 initial proposals to a single merged proposal
>(baseline) between November 2005 and March 2006. I think that, coupled
>with Stuart's press release indicating similar movement towards
>consensus in one of his TGs, it is important to give 802 some positive
>press rather than simply allowing them to feed on the occasional
>contentious deadlock as has, unfortunately, been the case in the past.
>(Karen McCabe had reviewed, edited, and approved the previously
>circulated version (prior to Roger's editorial suggestions), so I am
>simultaneously cc'ing the "r1" version attached to her for her review
>and approval and do not anticipate that she will have any problems with
>the editorial changes that Roger suggested and I've accepted. However,
>regardless of the EC vote on this ballot, I will not ask Karen to
>release the press release in the event she does have problems with the
>changes. I will also inform the EC ASAP if she indicates to me that
>she *does* have any problems with the changes and I will re-start the
>clock on the ballot on a "r2" version that addresses any unanticipated
>issues she may have with the revised version.)
>This ("10 day")EC e-mail ballot will close at 11:59 pm EST on April
>9th, 2006, or when all EC members have voted, whichever comes first.
>Your prompt attention to voting will be appreciated.
>This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
>This list is maintained by Listserv.
>Attachment converted: Little Al:PR_P802 22V4_r1.doc (WDBN/<IC>)
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.