|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
Colleagues: Responses to the 802.3 venue poll have slowed to a trickle, so here are the results. The poll request simply included the material Buzz originally provided and asked for a direct response to me. I indicated that comments would remain anonymous, but that I might choose to look at NNA responses separately. I have split the comments into two groups, those from individuals with a North America address (as recorded in the 802.3 database), and those not domiciled in North America. The IEEE 802.3 reflector (only used for WG announcements) has 616 individuals subscribed. Total responses: 76 Vancouver 17 Rome NNA responses: 5 Vancouver 6 Rome Comments are attached. It is quite clear to me that there is strong support for NNA meetings within 802.3, but that cost remains an overriding criteria. Personally, I support Rome (my preference is not reflected in the above totals). I don't know if evaluated during a WG meeting I would have received a directed position, but I can't ignore an ~82% response favoring Vancouver and therefore feel compelled to reflect my WG's expressed opinion and vote for Vancouver. I will continue to advocate for both NNA plenary and interim sessions in 802.3. --Bob Grow ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.