[802SEC] Response to comments on 802.15.4j PAR and 5C [MBAN]
Below are the responses to the comments received on the 802.15.4k PAR and
5C. The revised PAR and 5C [15-10-0756-08 and 15-10-0757-04] can be found
at http://ieee802.org/15/pending.html
Individual Comments on 802.15.4j 5C
Comment 1
(2 submitters of this comment) Upon review, the incorrect Criteria #2 was
used for the proposed MBAN PAR.
[Response] Agree. An older version of the 5 Criteria was used.
[Action:] Update Criteria Question 2. Modify Criteria question 2 answer by
replacing the answer with the following text, "This amendment will not
affect the IEEE 802.15.4 standards compliance with the IEEE 802.
Architecture, Management, and Interworking documents as required. There is
no specific technology feature anticipated in the amendment that could
preclude this compliance.
Comment 2
The 5C does not address coexistence as a separate item in Criteria 4.
[Response] Agree. An older version of the 5 Criteria was used.
[Action:] Update Section 4 to include the following text "Coexistence of
802 wireless standards specifying devices for unlicensed operation" before
the sentence "An appropriate coexistence assurance document will be created".
802.11 Comments on 802.15.4j 5C
Comment 3
In the 5C, make it the Low Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks
(WPAN-LR)match&throughout the 5C. Consider (LR-WPAN).
[Response] Agree. We will consistently refer to LR-WPAN in the 5C document.
[Action:] Update the 5C to consistently use LR-WPAN.
Comment 4
Update the 5C requirements to those found in LMSC OM 12.5.
[Response] See Comment 1 & 2
[Action:] none additional
Comment 5
3. Distinct Identity: 802.15.6 is listed in 7.1, but not explained the
Distinct Identity. The current wording indicates that 15.6 is similar, and
it is not clear as to the differences.
-c) it is easy for readers...if it is a MBAN spectrum, how is that
different from the 802.15.6 MBAN uses.
[Response] State more clearly the difference between 15.6 and MBAN
[Action:] Keep first sentence. Replace remaining text with: The proposed
amendment to IEEE 802.15.4 targets both on and off body applications. IEEE
802.15.6 is addressing communication in the vicinity of or inside a human
body. The proposed amendment to IEEE 802.15.4 will address low data rate
applications. IEEE P802.15.6 is targeting significantly higher data rates
and lower power consumption applications. The proposed amendment to IEEE
802.15.4 will not address SAR [specific absorbed radiation]. IEEE P802.15.6
may take SAR into consideration
Comment 6
Missing coexistence statement
[Response] See Comment 2
[Action:] none additional
802.19 Comments on 802.15.4j 5C
Comment 7
The 5C does not specify if a coexistence assurance (CA) document will be
provided as per Section 12.5.4.1 of the LMSC Operations Manual. Either
state that a CA document will be produced or explain why a CA document is
not needed.
[Response] See Comment 2
[Action:] none additional
802.11 Comments on 802.15.4j PAR
Comment 8
5.2 Scope: Add "new" prior to physical layer. Remove "current revision",
Add "IEEE" prior to 802.15.4. Spell out the Acronyms "FCC, MBAN, and
MAC". Split the end of the sentence into a new sentence as follows: delete
"and any" end sentence: "This amendment defines modifications to the MAC
that support the new physical layer"
[Response] Agree.
[Action:] Update the PAR with recommended changes
Comment 9
5.4 Purpose: The Scope says that you are describing a new PHY not
services. Redo sentence. Delete "The definition of" in the 3rd
sentence. Expand what "15.4" and "15.4e" really are "IEEE 802.15.4 and
IEEE P802.15.4e" would be better not having them specifically there to
begin with. Consider deleting the Purpose Text and replace with "This
amendment will not have a Purpose Statement."
[Response] IEEE 802.15 prefers for all amendments to have a Purpose and it
is an offered NesCom field. Agree with the recommended changes to Purpose
statement.
[Action:] Reword first sentence to make clear that we are not planning to
specify a service. Delete "The definition of" in the 3rd sentence. Use the
full name IEEE 802.15.4. Remove reference to 802.15.4e since this is an
example and is not necessary
Comment 10
5.5 Need: Put in "IEEE" in front 802.15.4. and expand "15.4" to "IEEE
802.15.4". Expand acronyms "NPRM".
[Response] Agree
[Action:] Add recommended text and expand acronym
Comment 11
5.5 Need: Suggest change "FCC has made a" to "FCC has issued an"
[Response ] Agree.
[Action:] Implement wording change in text
Comment 12
5.5 Need: Change "This amendment' to "This Project" in the last sentence.
[Response] Agree
[Action:] Change wording in the text
Comment 13
5.5 Need: Change 3rd sentence: Delete "may".
[Response] Agree.
[Action:] Remove the offending "may"
Comment 14
5.6 Stakeholders: change stakeholders statement as follows:
"The stakeholders include Medical equipment manufacturers, patients and
healthcare providers both within hospitals and in residential environments
along with service providers that offer remote support facilities."
[Response] Agree
[Action:] Remove the first sentence of 5.6 and combine the final two
sentences as recommended
Comment 15
7.1: similar scope: Expand the Yes description. Include a minimum of the
missing IEEE
[Response] Agree
[Action:] Use new text in 5C Criteria 3 from Comment 5 to outline
difference between 15.6 and MBAN and place explanation in section 7.4
Additional Explanatory Notes
Bob Heile, Ph.D
Chairman, ZigBee Alliance
Chair, IEEE 802.15 Working Group on Wireless Personal Area Networks
Co-Chair IEEE P2030 Task Force 3 on Smartgrid Communications
11 Robert Toner Blvd
Suite 5-301
North Attleboro, MA 02763 USA
Mobile: +1-781-929-4832
email: bheile@ieee.org
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.