Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-PHY-Preamble Puncture



Thanks Dongguk,

This line had been removed.

 

Best regards,

Oded

 

From: Dongguk Lim [mailto:dongguk.lim@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 5:33 AM
To: Oded Redlich (TRC) <oded.redlich@xxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: hg.cho@xxxxxxx; js.choi@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-PHY-Preamble Puncture

 

Hi Oded,

Thanks for your efforts,

As below motion, the BW field does not include the information related Preamble puncturing.

802.11be supports BW field which does not include puncturing information.

[Motion 112, #SP29, [13] and [45]]

And, regarding the indication of preamble puncturing, Since you have already explained in the previous sentence, I think that the following sentence is not needed.

“ 11be STA can recognize the preamble puncturing pattern it needs by using the BW field and puncturing information of U-SIG and/or EHT-SIG field”

 

Best regards,

Dongguk

 

 

From: Oded Redlich (TRC) [mailto:oded.redlich@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2020 4:35 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-PHY-Preamble Puncture

 

Hello Preamble Puncture TTTs and all,

I have uploaded the initial draft for the preamble-puncture sub-clause to the server. The document reference number is 1319.

Your comments are welcomed.

 

BR,

Oded

 

From: Oded Redlich (TRC) [mailto:oded.redlich@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 2:21 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-PHY-Preamble Puncture

 

Dear TTTs of preamble puncture,

This is a kind reminder to volunteer to write the text of the below suggested sub-clauses.

 

BR,

 

Oded

 

From: Oded Redlich (TRC)
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 4:52 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-PHY-Preamble Puncture

 

Dear preamble puncture TTTs,

Preamble puncture text is suggested to be inserted in a new sub-section 34.3.10.10  “Preamble Puncture”.

Also new text in section 9.4.2.xxx (“EHT Capabilities Element”) will probably be added to define the sub-field “EHT PHY Capabilities Information field”. We need to define the preamble puncture Rx capabilities within this sub-field (similar to how it is defined in 9.4.2.247 in 11axD6.0)

Thus I suggest the following list of sub clauses to be added:

Under 34.3.10.10 – Preamble Puncture

o   34.3.10.10.1 – General

o   34.3.10.10.2 – Preamble Puncture for PPDUs transmitted to a single user

o   34.3.10.10.3 – Preamble Puncture for PPDUs transmitted to multiple users

Under 9.4.2.xxx.yyy – EHT PHY Capabilities Information field

o   Punctured Preamble Rx

 

Please feel free to volunteer to write a specific section

In addition, please let me know if you have any comments or if I have missed something

 

BR,

 

Oded Redlich

 

 


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1