Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[STDS-802-11-TGBE] 答复: PDT review on Effect of CH_BANDWIDTH parameter on PPDU format

Hi Yujin,

 

It looks good to me. Thanks.

 

regards

于健 Ross Jian Yu

Huawei Technologies

 

发件人: Yujin Noh [mailto:yujin.noh@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
发送时间: 2021年1月30日 5:10
收件人: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT review on Effect of CH_BANDWIDTH parameter on PPDU format

 

Hi Ross and all,

 

I checked the 11ax cases in the table with Youhan. (Thank you, Youhan)

And it turned out some parts need to be updated.

 

  • First of all, puncturing signaling is now decoupled from bandwidth information in 11be (differently from 11ax). Since it is not necessary to consider EHT-CBW-PUNC80/160/320, all related description is removed from the table.
  • In case of EHT TB PPDU, its transmit bandwidth is still 20/40/80/160 MHz regardless of assigned RUs, delete “except for EHT TB PPDU” in the initial draft.

 

If there are additional comments, please let me know.

 

Regards,

Yujin

 

From: Yujin Noh <yujin.noh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 11:13 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT review on Effect of CH_BANDWIDTH parameter on PPDU format

 

Hi Ross

 

Thank you for being TTT in this subclause. I will add you as co-authors for the next version.

Please take a look at my response in red below.

 

Regards,

Yujin

 

From: Yujian (Ross Yu) <ross.yujian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 4:44 PM
To: Yujin Noh <yujin.noh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: 答复: PDT review on Effect of CH_BANDWIDTH parameter on PPDU format

 

Hi Yujin,

 

Thanks for preparing the PDTs.

 

You have several parts mentioning SST operation is in TBD. I suggest to remove the sentence to reduce the number of TBDs. Later if we define specific operation in 11be, we can add the specific description for SST operation.

è I will remove it from the table.

 

Also there are serval parts mentioning TBD in EHT TB PPDU for EHT-CBW-PUNC80/160/320. I think in 11ax, it only applied to HE MU PPDU format. Are you assuming for MRU case of EHT TB PPDU, it should be categorized to punctured CH_BANDWIDTH?

è We might need clarification. As you mentioned, MRU is indicated in RU Allocation subfield in Trigger frame for each STA. Not to support punctured channel indication like EHT MU PPDU. However it does not mean not to support punctured CH_BANDWIDTH. So I left it as TBD. If I missed anything the group decided, let me know. If it is clear, then I will delete it.

 

To Edward,

 

Please include me as a TTT. Thanks.

 

 

 

regards

于健 Ross Jian Yu

Huawei Technologies

 

发件人: Yujin Noh [mailto:yujin.noh@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
发送时间: 2021年1月27日 6:16
收件人: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT review on Effect of CH_BANDWIDTH parameter on PPDU format

 

Dear all,

 

Please find the draft of PDT - Effect of CH_BANDWIDTH parameter on PPDU format.

Given no TTT in this topic, special welcome if you have any comments.

 

Regards,

Yujin

 

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1