| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Chunyu, Concerning CID 16285, I do not catch the reason of rejection : “The quiet interval can still protect R-TWT SP start time
in applicable TWT configuration, e.g. when the TWT wake up interval is in TU granularity.” The comment was about the start of the protection : due to the nature of specification of Quiet Element (especially Quiet Count field, with value 0 reserved as per 9.4.2.22), one Quiet
element can not protect any SP period during the 1st TBTT following the beacon frame embedding this Quiet element. If you refer as TU granularity (as in the comment resolution) , this would correspond to approximately having the first 100 TUs unprotected (when TBTT is 100ms). I would suggest adding a Note like this: NOTE: Due to the specification of Quiet Element (as defined in 9.4.2.22 (Quiet element)), an R-TWT scheduling AP might transmit
Quiet elements in Beacon and Probe Response frames at least one TBTT in advance to the targeted schedule of R-TWT SP(s) to protect. Regards, Pascal From: Chunyu Hu <chunyuhu07@xxxxxxxxx>
Hi, all: We deferred a few CIDs in presenting 11-23/847r1. Would the folks requesting the deferral or comments please review and/or share any further thoughts you may have on the CIDs below? 16700, 16701: @Yonggang Fang 15935, 16652: @Gaurang Naik 16678: @Qi Wang 16420, 16424: @Jeongki Kim 15834, 17090: revised per discussion in mtg. @Mark Rison @Rubayet Shafin would you please review? Let me know if I miss any. Thx! Chunyu To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |