Hi Chunyu,
Thanks for your document.
There are some minor concern for the proposed text of CID# 16146.
1.
What is the definition of “the Broadcast TWT advertising Management frames” ? Does it refer to Beacon, Probe/(re)Association Request/Response frames?
It might be clarified.
2.
IMO, how does the non-AP EHT STAs that don’t support R-TWT recognize the overlapping quiet is implementation dependent and is out of the scope of this standard,
so we may just simply point it out.
3.
If there are something that I am not considered or people has strong opinion to keep the current proposed text here, I suggest to change “ doesn’t have dot11RestrictedTWTOptionImplemented
set to true” to “has dot11RestrictedTWTOptionImplemented set to false”.
|
16146 |
SunHee Baek |
35.8.5.2 |
621.10 |
In R-TWT, overlapping quiet interval sets 1 TU to guarantee R-TWT SP, but the current spec doesn't support any method for non-AP EHT STAs that don't support R-TWT to ignore overlapping quiet interval. |
Please specify how non-AP EHT STAs that don't support R-TWT may behave as if overlapping quiet intervals do not exist. |
Revised. An EHT non-AP STA can still choose to parse the TWT element to extract R-TWT info and choose to ignore overlapping intervals as
an example. Add a NOTE. TGbe editor: please revise as specified in this doc {11-23/847r2} tagged by #16146. |
(#16146)NOTE3—An EHT non-AP STA that is not a member of
an R-TWT SP or that doesn’t have dot11RestrictedTWTOptionImplemented set to true might parse the TWT element in the Broadcast TWT advertising Management frames and decide whether an quiet interval
is an overlapping one and decide whether to ignore it.
BR，
Yingqiao Quan
Communication Standards Devision
发件人: Chunyu Hu <chunyuhu07@xxxxxxxxx>
发送时间: 2023年6月21日
13:30
收件人: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Please review 11-23/847r2 (deferred CIDs)
|
注意:
这封邮件来自于外部。除非你确定邮件内容安全，否则不要点击任何链接和附件。
|
Hi, all:
We deferred a few CIDs in presenting 11-23/847r1. Would the folks requesting the deferral or comments please review and/or share any further thoughts you may have on the CIDs below?
16700, 16701: @Yonggang Fang
15935, 16652: @Gaurang Naik
16678: @Qi Wang
16420, 16424: @Jeongki Kim
15834, 17090: revised per discussion in mtg. @Mark Rison @Rubayet Shafin would you please review?
Let me know if I miss any. Thx!
Chunyu
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1