| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Yongho, Thanks. In your update, the paragraph of the default mode and parameterized mode is removed. My understanding is that it is nothing to do with option1 and
option 2. Best Regards, Liwen From: Yongho Seok <yongho.seok@xxxxxxxxx>
Hi Liwen, Thanks for your hard work. You stated that Option 1 and Option 2 were removed. But, I still see some paragraphs of Option 1 and Option 2 are there. As just one of several instances,
In Option 1, A DPS mobile AP may use the Operating Mode Notification frame and the OM Control field to update its operating bandwidth and Nss to be same as the bandwidth
and Nss in its LC Mode Bandwidth field and LC Mode Nss field. In Option 2,
A DPS mobile AP that set the ICF Required field to 0 may use the Operating Mode Notification frame and the
OM Control field to update its operating bandwidth and Nss to be same as the bandwidth and Nss in its LC Mode Bandwidth field and LC Mode Nss field. In your revision, you add the following revised wording. But, this is still debatable since this is needed only if the ICF Required field
is set to 0. A mobile AP shall use the Operating Mode Notification frame or the OM Control field to update its operating bandwidth and Nss to
be same as the bandwidth and Nss in its LC Mode Bandwidth field and LC Mode Nss field before enabling the DPS mode. It seems that you pick the common parts of Option 1 and Option 2. But, in such a case, eventually, the remaining part becomes a subset of Option 1. If your intention is to first resolve non-debatable parts, I suggest removing all texts in the Option 1 and Option 2 brackets. Please see the revised version. Thanks, Yongho 2025년 7월 30일 (수)
오후 10:42, Liwen Chu <liwen.chu@xxxxxxx>님이 작성:
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 |