Thank you for your comment and suggested edits. I’ll incorporate your editorial changes into the next revision. Regarding your second suggestion that changes from “should" to “shall”, it seems reasonable to me. Let me update it in the next revision as well
unless I hear different feedback from another member.
From: Xiaofei Wang <Xiaofei.Wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, January 26, 2026 at 2:19 PM
To: Kiseon Ryu <kiseon.ryu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rui Yang <Rui.Yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] LB291 CR for NPCA and STA unavailability
Hi Kiseon,
I have added some editorial changes (highlighted in yellow) to the last two paragraphs of the document. Just trying to make
the text more clear. Please take a look.
Also, I wonder whether we should make the action a “shall” instead of “should” if the first STA knows for sure that the second STA is not available on the NPCA primary channel.
Xiaofei Clement Wang
Principal Engineer | InterDigital
T: (631) 622.4028
E: Xiaofei.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Kiseon Ryu <kiseon.ryu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2026 1:47 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] LB291 CR for NPCA and STA unavailability
Hi NPCA TTT members,
I have prepared the following CR doc related to NPCA and STA unavailability. It would be highly appreciated if you could please review and provide your feedback.
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/26/11-26-0080-00-00bn-lb291-cr-for-npca-and-sta-unavailability.docx
Hi @Alfred Asterjadhi, can you please help update the link for above CR doc in the TGbn agenda document?
Regards,
Kiseon
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1