| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Abhi, Thanks for the contribution. I am wondering whether another note is needed to say that “TID-TO-LINK mapping may be remapped in case that the link to be in PS mode to the current MLD is the only
link for some TIDs”. For the second bullet in the added note, it may be clearer to change to:
-
A non-AP MLD operating in EMLSR mode with the current AP MLD can manage DL reception from the current AP MLD by choosing
to or not to respond to an ICF sent by the current AP MLD. Another point is to suggest to add the PS mode of each link to the current AP MLD and to the target AP MLD into ST request to make the procedure more efficient. BR, Xiangxin Gu Institute of Communication Technology From:
周培 <zhoupei36@xxxxxxxxx>
Hi Abhi, Thanks for sharing this. I have one clarification question about the first bullet "A multi-radio non-AP MLD can simultaneously receive DL data frames from the
current AP MLD on one link and exchange frames with the target AP MLD on another link." If the multi-radio non-AP MLD is STR, then it is ok. However, if the multi-radio non-AP MLD is NSTR, I think we may need additional text to handle the PPDU end time alignment issue. Thanks. Best regards, Pei Zhou TCL Abhishek Patil <0000297b717f2a04-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
于2026年7月3日周五 05:27写道:
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 |