| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Dear Alfred and all,I posted revision 3 that addressed comments I received from Eugene, Bin, Yongho, Wook Bong, and Yan:https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/26/11-26-1283-03-00bn-lb291-comment-resolution-for-pics.docx
Regards,EdwardOn Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 5:51 PM Edward Au <edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Dear Alfred and all,I posted revision 2 that addressed comments I received from Rony and Laurent:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/26/11-26-1283-02-00bn-lb291-comment-resolution-for-pics.docx
Regards,EdwardOn Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 5:30 PM Edward Au <edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Dear Tomo-san,Thank you. I agree with you that we do not need this redundancy.I just uploaded revision 1 that addressed comments from you, Binita, Massinissa, and Xiangxin:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/26/11-26-1283-01-00bn-lb291-comment-resolution-for-pics.docx
Regards,EdwardOn Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 5:16 PM <tomoko.adachi.b99@mail.toshiba> wrote:
Hi Edward,
Thank you for this.
Do we need to repeat “CFUHR” where there is for example “CFUHR5G”? Please see such as items CFUHR80 and UHRP2.33.
From my understanding, “CFUHR5G” is “CFUHR”, so “CFUHR AND” part is redundant.
Best regards,
tomo
From: Edward Au <edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2026 6:51 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] Proposed resolution for Annex B, PICS, posted
Dear Alfred and all,
Proposed resolution for Annex B, PICS, is posted:
Of note is that it is an 18-page contribution. Appreciate your time and effort to review and please let me know if you have any comments or suggestions.
Regards,
Edward
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1