Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] P802.11bn Draft D2.0 Now Available

I believe so but will leave it to Ross to confirm.

Regards,

Alfred

On Mon, Aug 3, 2026, 3:43 PM Srini Kandala <srini.k1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Alfred,

 

Thanks – I could go either way and whether it is on that page or not is not that important to me 😊.

 

Can you confirm the comment resolution document is 25/1772r16?

 

Thanks.

Regards,

srini

 

From: Alfred Asterjadhi <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2026 3:38 PM
To: Srini Kandala <srini.k1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Stacey, Robert <robert.stacey@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] P802.11bn Draft D2.0 Now Available

 

Hi Srini, [+ WG chair in cc for any further insights and to confirm my understanding] Per my understanding, LB295 is an initial letter ballot, so the requirement to include a comment resolution document and a redline document does not apply. 

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart

This Message Is From an External Sender

Use caution opening files, clicking links or responding to requests.

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd

Hi Srini,

 

[+ WG chair in cc for any further insights and to confirm my understanding]

 

Per my understanding, LB295 is an initial letter ballot, so the requirement to include a comment resolution document and a redline document does not apply. Checking the history of past letter ballots, comment resolution information and the associated redline are typically provided as part of the subsequent recirculation letter ballots. Therefore, the N/A entry is expected for the current LB295 ballot.

Regards,

 

Alfred

 

 

On Mon, Aug 3, 2026 at 2:37 PM Srini Kandala <srini.k1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Alfred,

 

Thanks – found it.

 

Again, thanks a lot for the team. All of this takes lot of energy for almost an year and I appreciate it! So please do not think I am nitpicking!

 

Is there a reason the resolution document is not included into the “Ballot Details” (it says NA). Could this be added? I assume that the Redline version would also be added as it is available.

 

Thanks.

Regards,

srini

 

From: Alfred Asterjadhi <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2026 2:29 PM
To: Srini Kandala <srini.k1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] P802.11bn Draft D2.0 Now Available

 

Hi Srini, That doc can be found under Other documents. Regards, Alfred On Mon, Aug 3, 2026 at 2: 24 PM Srini Kandala <srini. k1@ samsung. com> wrote: Hi Alfred, Looking at .11mf draft 3. 0, I think the convention is also to put the CIDs next

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart

This Message Is From an External Sender

Use caution opening files, clicking links or responding to requests.

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd

Hi Srini,

 

That doc can be found under Other documents.

 

Regards,

 

Alfred

 

 

On Mon, Aug 3, 2026 at 2:24 PM Srini Kandala <srini.k1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Alfred,

 

Looking at .11mf draft 3.0, I think the convention is also to put the CIDs next to the changes even in the clean version. It would have helped if we had these references. Can we also have a clean version with references to the CID that effected the changes?

 

Thanks.

Regards,

srini

 

From: Alfred Asterjadhi <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2026 12:37 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] P802.11bn Draft D2.0 Now Available

 

Hi Sigurd, Yes, we will announce, when redline 2. 0 compared to 1. 0 is available in the members area, with a separate email in the next day or so. Regards, Alfred On Mon, Aug 3, 2026, 12: 31 PM Sigurd Schelstraete <0000147fea1cee5c-dmarc-request@ listserv. ieee. org>

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart

This Message Is From an External Sender

Use caution opening files, clicking links or responding to requests.

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd

Hi Sigurd,

 

Yes, we will announce, when redline 2.0 compared to 1.0 is available in the members area, with a separate email in the next day or so. 

 

Regards,

 

Alfred

 

On Mon, Aug 3, 2026, 12:31 PM Sigurd Schelstraete <0000147fea1cee5c-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Alfred, Ross,

For major draft revisions (e.g. D2.0) we usually get a redline version relative to the immediately preceding draft (D1.5 in this case) and the last major revision (D1.0). In this case, I only see a revision relative to D1.5.

Not to put an undue burden on the editor but is it possible to have a revision relative to D1.0 as well?

 

Thanks,

 

Sigurd

 

From: Alfred Asterjadhi <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2026 11:43 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] P802.11bn Draft D2.0 Now Available

 

This email was sent from outside of MaxLinear.

 

Hello all,


P802.11bn Draft D2.0 is now available in the members area:

https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/private/Draft_Standards/11bn/index.html

Many thanks to our editor, Ross, for working around the clock to ensure timely delivery of the draft.

 

Also, if you are in the list of voters, please consider voting on the working group letter ballot LB296. Instructions can be found here.

 

Regards,
Alfred

 

--

Alfred Asterjadhi, PhD

IEEE802.11 Vice Chair/TGbn Chair,

Qualcomm Technologies Inc.

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1