Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] MAC PDT 11-26/1769 for subclause 9.3.1.8.6.1

 

Hi Liwen,

 

Some comments:

l  The resolution for CID 19111 should be revised, not rejected, as change is made according to it.

l  I think the resolution for CID 18903 is not convincing. Why not explain that Figure 9-66 is changed to express acknowledgement context and AID11 being 2008 is not the case, as it is for feedback (Figure 9-66b)?

l  For the text change according to CID 19216 in 37.6.1, I think you meant that in the TB PPDU, if any one of the transmitter is a non-UHR STA, then the UHR AP shall not transmit such a Multi-STA BlockAck frame. And “an UHR …” should be “a UHR …”. How about saying like “A UHR AP shall not transmit a Multi-STA BlockAck frame that is solicited by a TB PPDU wherein any one of the transmitters is a non-UHR STA and includes …”?

 

Best regards,

tomo

 

From: Liwen Chu <liwen.chu@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 9, 2026 2:51 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] MAC PDT 11-26/1769 for subclause 9.3.1.8.6.1

 

 

Hi all,

 

Please find the comment resolutions for subclause 9.3.1.8.6.1 in 11-26/1766.

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/26/11-26-1769-00-00bn-lb296-subclause-9-3-1-8-6-1-cids.docx

 

If you have comments, please let me know.

 

Hi Alfred,

 

Please add it to the agenda.

 

Best Regards,

Liwen

 

 

 

NXP Confidential

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1