Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] [EXT] RE: MAC PDT 11-26/1769 for subclause 9.3.1.8.6.1



Hi tomo,

 

Thanks for the comments. Please find my replies below.

 

Best Regards,

Liwen

 


NXP Confidential

From: tomoko.adachi.b99@mail.toshiba <tomoko.adachi.b99@mail.toshiba>
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2026 6:59 PM
To: Liwen Chu <liwen.chu@xxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [EXT] RE: MAC PDT 11-26/1769 for subclause 9.3.1.8.6.1

 

 

Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report this email' button

 

 

Hi Liwen,

 

Some comments:

l  The resolution for CID 19111 should be revised, not rejected, as change is made according to it.

[Liwen] Fixed

l  I think the resolution for CID 18903 is not convincing. Why not explain that Figure 9-66 is changed to express acknowledgement context and AID11 being 2008 is not the case, as it is for feedback (Figure 9-66b)?

[Liwen] You are right. How about the following change

               NOTE 2—More than one Feedback Per AID TID Info field with the same value in the AID11 field can be present in the Multi-STA BlockAck frame. (#18903) If AID11 field is equal to 2008 in a Feedback Per AID TID Info field, the Feedback Per AID TID Info field is applies to all receiving UHR STAs.

 

l  For the text change according to CID 19216 in 37.6.1, I think you meant that in the TB PPDU, if any one of the transmitter is a non-UHR STA, then the UHR AP shall not transmit such a Multi-STA BlockAck frame. And “an UHR …” should be “a UHR …”. How about saying like “A UHR AP shall not transmit a Multi-STA BlockAck frame that is solicited by a TB PPDU wherein any one of the transmitters is a non-UHR STA and includes …”?

[Liwen] In the proposed sentence, it seems the “includes..” in “wherein any one of the transmitters is a non-UHR STA and includes…” belong to “any one of the transmitters”. This will create confusion.

 

 

Best regards,

tomo

 

From: Liwen Chu <liwen.chu@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 9, 2026 2:51 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] MAC PDT 11-26/1769 for subclause 9.3.1.8.6.1

 

 

Hi all,

 

Please find the comment resolutions for subclause 9.3.1.8.6.1 in 11-26/1766.

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/26/11-26-1769-00-00bn-lb296-subclause-9-3-1-8-6-1-cids.docx

 

If you have comments, please let me know.

 

Hi Alfred,

 

Please add it to the agenda.

 

Best Regards,

Liwen

 

 

 

NXP Confidential


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1