Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBP] Procedural Question

Thanks Bo, I will follow that procedure.

 

Regards,

Steve

 

From: sun.bo1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <sun.bo1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2025 5:59 PM
To: Steve Shellhammer <sshellha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGBP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Procedural Question

 

WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.

Hello, Steve, 

 

That's a good question! 

 

In that case, I'd agree with you, i.e. it's better to go for a new PDT to propose new spec text and modified spec text to D0.1.  And it will be easier for our editor to capture the modification history in that way.

 

Best Regards,

Bo

 

 

 

Original

From: SteveShellhammer <sshellha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  

To: 孙波0318003590;STDS-802-11-TGBP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11-TGBP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;  

Date:  2025年09月25日 23:43  

Subject: Procedural Question  

Hi Bo,

 

                At the last meeting we approved the Downlink PPDU PDT.  We need to also include the sub-1GHz Downlink PPDU.

 

                Do you prefer to modify the earlier PDT, or should I make a new PDT?  I was thinking it would be cleaner to do a new PDT. What do you think?

 

Regards,

Steve

 

 

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBP list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBP&A=1