Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBP] SP regarding one-shot communiation

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 8:31 PM Guy-Armand Kamendje <guy-armand@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Sam,
Would Monday 4:30pm to 5pm work for you?
Regards,
G

On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 8:01 PM Sam Shi <Sam.Shi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi all,

I further update the SP texts with new texts in red

Let me know your thoughts for this SP.

Thanks,

Sam

From: Sam Shi <Sam.Shi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2026 2:36 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11-TGBP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: SP regarding one-shot communiation

Hi Guy, Hui, Rojan, Amichai, and all,

Thanks for your comments on the contribution regarding one-shot communication. The comments were mostly on the technical aspects and procedure itself, which we can further discuss. From a use case perspective, I would like to get an agreement of defining such use case in bp. My proposed SP is as follows:

Do you agree to add the following text in the TGbp SFD

11bp supports secure one-shot communication between the AMP AP and STAs without requiring a discovery and/or association phase.

A DL PPDU with UL access information and parameters for security procedure.

An UL PPDU with protected UL response.

A DL Ack that acknowledges the UL PPDU has been successfully received and decoded.

There is no Ack if the PPDU was not received nor decoded.

Note:

such one-shot communication still follows the baseline security mechanism in MM-17/Motion #64

The above does not apply to mono-static backscatter non-AP AMP STAs.

Let me what do you think.

Thanks,

Sam

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBP list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBP&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBP list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBP&A=1