| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Dear Jay, thank you for your efforts for addressing the editorial comments. After review, please find below some comments from my side for your consideration:
1.
Comment resolution for the CIDs 439, 440 and 542 is missing.
2.
CID 434: to be consistent shouldn’t the definition be set to lowercase letters (“ML-KEM
Module-Lattice-Based
Key-Encapsulation
Mechanism”)?
3.
Comment resolution for the CIDs 169, 205, 565, 721, 728: all 5 CIDs related to clause 10.28.15, page# 29, line# 36 were accepted but they result in different
options, see below. Please check which option you want to accept. From:
To:
In this context there is another CID 336 that was assigned to you and where it is proposed to add the word “field” in the concerned paragraph, see below. You may have
missed it.
BR Hyung-Nam / Lenovo From: Jay Yang <yang.zhijie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hi All, The approximately 122 editorial comments assigned to me have been addressed in
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/26/11-26-1846-00-00bt-lb297-cr-for-editorial-comments.xlsx. As usual, to save time, I do not plan to discuss them one by one during the session. Instead, I still count on members to review them offline. Please take a look, and send me an email if any issues are found. 杨志杰10343608 Thanks Best Regards Jay Yang (杨志杰) To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBT list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBT&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBT list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBT&A=1 |