Mark,
   
  Thanks 
  for the comments.  I think your discussion actually made the case for 
  getting rid of the term air-interface because it really does lack any 
  descriptive information about what we are developing.
   
  Therefore, 
  I would use the language of your definitions with the following 
  changes:
   
  Definition:
   
  1)  
  The radio-link  is the radio-frequency 
  portion of the transmission path between the wireless terminal (usually 
  portable or mobile) and the active base station or access 
  point.
  2) 
  The radio-link  is the shared boundary 
  between a wireless terminal and the base station or access 
  point.
   
  The 
  introduction to the final standard would read:
   
  This 
  standard specifies the layer 1 and layer 2 Radio Link Protocol or RLP, between 
  compliant wireless terminals and base stations. 
   
  I 
  don't think there is anything that would preclude us from using terminology 
  that is already used in other standards.  In fact, this may help many of 
  our 3GPP/2 members understand what it is we are trying to standardize, since 
  they have already done it.
   
  Best 
  Regards,
   
  geoff
   
  
  Geoffrey T. Anderson 
  
  Polar Industries, 
  Inc.
  45 Roe Avenue
  Cornwall on 
  Hudson, 
  NY  
  12520-1403
   
  Phone:  845-534-4589
  Fax:      845-818-3513
  Cell:      914-843-9572
 
  -----Original 
  Message-----
From: 
  owner-stds-80220-requirements@majordomo.ieee.org 
  [mailto:owner-stds-80220-requirements@majordomo.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Klerer 
  Mark
Sent: Wednesday, 
  October 08, 2003 
  4:23 
  PM
To: 'Jim Mollenauer'; Geoff 
  Anderson
Cc: 'Gang Wu'; 
  stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
Subject: RE: stds-80220-requirements: 
  Definition of "air interface"
   
  I 
  agree with Jim Mollenauer. Specifically the term RLP as used by Jim Tomcik 
  actually refers to a very specific protocol used in UMTS. Here is the 
  definition of RLP:
   
  RLP 
  - Radio Link Protocol
  Radio 
  Link Protocol terminates at the MS (Mobile Station) and the IWF (Interworking 
  Function) generally located at the MSC (Mobile Switching Centre). It utilizes 
  the reliability mechanisms of the underlying protocols in order to deliver 
  data. (http://www.mpirical.com/companion/mpirical_companion.html#http://www.mpirical.com/companion/GSM/RLP_-_Radio_Link_Protocol.htm)
   
  I 
  would like to toss out the following for people to consider.
   
  Considerata: 
  The word "Interface" is somewhat ambiguous in that we are using it in the two 
  senses given in Webster's:
   
  2 
  a : the place 
  at which independent and often unrelated systems meet and act on or 
  communicate with each other <the man-machine interface> b : the means by which interaction 
  or communication is achieved at an interface
   
  we seem to be using it in 
  both the sense of 2a and 2b. This is the root of the difference in the two 
  definitions that have been shared.  So we could speak about an 
  air-interface and even an air-interface interface. 
   
  We have the definition 
  provided by Gang Wu (via the Intel website) : 
  the air interface is the radio-frequency portion of the circuit between the 
  cellular phone set or wireless modem (usually portable or mobile) and the 
  active base station.
   
  And the one 
  provided by Dan Gal (via the Ericsson web-site): "The air interface is the shared boundary between a 
  mobile and the base station."
   
  IEEE 100 (The 
  Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms) provides the following 
  "general definition" [def 4] for "interface": A shared boundary
   
  Suggestion 
  for a way forward:
   
  I would 
  therefore suggest the following: We define air-interface as:
   
  Definition:
   
  1)  
  The air 
  interface is the radio-frequency portion of the transmission path between the 
  wireless terminal (usually portable or mobile) and the active base station or 
  access point.
  2) 
  The 
  air interface is the shared boundary between a wireless 
  terminal and 
  the base station or access point.
   
  I 
  am trying to avoid using air-interface interface, and I believe that 2 in 
  essence is taking a look at the "cross section" of the air interface between 
  the mobile and base station. I have paraphrased definition one to remove the 
  term "circuit" and replace it with the more generic "transmission path" due to 
  the potential connectionless packet nature of the path. 
   
  The 
  intro/preamble to the actual standard could then read eg:
   
  This standard 
  specifies the layer 1 and layer 2 protocols of the air-interface between 
  compliant wireless terminals and base stations. (English to be fixed and 
  polished when we get there).
   
  In 
  the requirements document we can put a similar statement in the overview. Note 
  that the discussion as to whether we indicate what layer a requirement applies 
  to is a separate issue. 
   
  This is in line 
  with IEEE standards, 3G standards and ISO standards that all use the term air 
  interface in a similar manner.
   
  Sorry about 
  this somewhat lengthy epistle. I hope it helps in getting us towards 
  closure.
   
  Mark
   
   
  -----Original 
  Message-----
From: Jim 
  Mollenauer [mailto:jmollenauer@technicalstrategy.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, 
  October 08, 2003 
  3:04 
  PM
To: Geoff Anderson
Cc: 'Gang Wu'; 
  stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
Subject: Re: stds-80220-requirements: 
  Definition of "air interface"
   
  I respectfully 
  disagree.  A protocol and an interface are not the same thing.  A 
  protocol specifies what happens when, and generally involves several 
  information transfers across one or more interfaces.  An interface is the 
  boundary between two entities, across which information may flow according to 
  some protocol.
The term "air interface" emphasizes that we are 
  standardizing the information flow through the air between two systems, and 
  not across some internal wired interface within one of the systems.  
  Calling it a "radio link" is confusing: does that imply link layer or physical 
  layer?
Let's keep "air interface".
Jim Mollenauer
Geoff 
  Anderson wrote:
  I think 
  Jim Tomcik had discussed a term Radio Link Protocol, or RLP during the 
  San 
  Francisco meeting.  After 
  replacing Air Link with Radio Link or Radio Link Protocol in the document and 
  then re-reading, it seems to make much more sense.
   
  I would 
  agree with Alan's 10/2 proposal to remove Air Interface and replace with Radio 
  Link or Radio Link Protocol where it makes sense.  Also this decision 
  would carry forward to all documents of 802.20, as Alan 
  proposed.
   
  geoff
   
  
  Geoffrey 
  T. Anderson 
  45 Roe 
  Avenue
  Cornwall on 
  Hudson, NY  
  12520-1403
   
  Phone:  845-534-4589
  Fax:      845-818-3513
  Cell:      914-843-9572
 
  -----Original 
  Message-----
From: owner-stds-80220-requirements@majordomo.ieee.org 
  [mailto:owner-stds-80220-requirements@majordomo.ieee.org] 
  On Behalf Of Gang Wu
Sent: Thursday, October 
  02, 2003 2:33 
  PM
To: stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
Subject: stds-80220-requirements: 
  Definition of "air interface"
   
  
  At least I found one from 
  the web.
 
  
  
  "In cellular telephone 
  communications, the air interface is the radio-frequency portion of the 
  circuit between the cellular phone set or wireless modem (usually portable or 
  mobile) and the active base station."