Mark,
     
    Thanks 
    for the comments.  I think your discussion actually made the case for 
    getting rid of the term air-interface because it really does lack any 
    descriptive information about what we are developing.
     
    Therefore, 
    I would use the language of your definitions with the following 
    changes:
     
    Definition:
     
    1)  
    The radio-link  is the radio-frequency 
    portion of the transmission path between the wireless terminal (usually 
    portable or mobile) and the active base station or access 
    point.
    2) 
    The radio-link  is the shared boundary 
    between a wireless terminal and the base station or access 
    point.
     
    The 
    introduction to the final standard would read:
     
    This 
    standard specifies the layer 1 and layer 2 Radio Link Protocol or RLP, 
    between compliant wireless terminals and base stations. 
    
     
    I 
    don't think there is anything that would preclude us from using terminology 
    that is already used in other standards.  In fact, this may help many 
    of our 3GPP/2 members understand what it is we are trying to standardize, 
    since they have already done it.
     
    Best 
    Regards,
     
    geoff
     
    
    Geoffrey T. Anderson 
    
    Polar Industries, 
    Inc.
    45 Roe Avenue
    Cornwall on 
    Hudson, 
    NY  
    12520-1403
     
    Phone:  845-534-4589
    Fax:      845-818-3513
    Cell:      914-843-9572
 
    -----Original 
    Message-----
From: 
    owner-stds-80220-requirements@majordomo.ieee.org 
    [mailto:owner-stds-80220-requirements@majordomo.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Klerer 
    Mark
Sent: Wednesday, 
    October 08, 2003 
    4:23 
    PM
To: 'Jim Mollenauer'; 
    Geoff 
    Anderson
Cc: 'Gang Wu'; 
    stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
Subject: RE: stds-80220-requirements: 
    Definition of "air interface"
     
    I agree with 
    Jim Mollenauer. Specifically the term RLP as used by Jim Tomcik actually 
    refers to a very specific protocol used in UMTS. Here is the definition of 
    RLP:
     
    RLP 
    - Radio Link Protocol
    Radio 
    Link Protocol terminates at the MS (Mobile Station) and the IWF 
    (Interworking Function) generally located at the MSC (Mobile Switching 
    Centre). It utilizes the reliability mechanisms of the underlying protocols 
    in order to deliver data. 
    (http://www.mpirical.com/companion/mpirical_companion.html#http://www.mpirical.com/companion/GSM/RLP_-_Radio_Link_Protocol.htm)
     
    I would like 
    to toss out the following for people to consider.
     
    Considerata: 
    The word "Interface" is somewhat ambiguous in that we are using it in the 
    two senses given in Webster's:
     
    2 a : the place at which independent and 
    often unrelated systems meet and act on or communicate with each other 
    <the man-machine interface> b : the means by which interaction 
    or communication is achieved at an interface
     
    we seem to be using it in 
    both the sense of 2a and 2b. This is the root of the difference in the two 
    definitions that have been shared.  So we could speak about an 
    air-interface and even an air-interface interface. 
     
    We have the definition 
    provided by Gang Wu (via the Intel website) : 
    the air interface is the radio-frequency portion of the circuit between the 
    cellular phone set or wireless modem (usually portable or mobile) and the 
    active base station.
     
    And the one 
    provided by Dan Gal (via the Ericsson web-site): "The air interface is the shared boundary between 
    a mobile and the base station."
     
    IEEE 100 (The 
    Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms) provides the following 
    "general definition" [def 4] for "interface": A shared boundary
     
    Suggestion 
    for a way forward:
     
    I 
    would therefore suggest the following: We define air-interface 
    as:
     
    Definition:
     
    1)  
    The air 
    interface is the radio-frequency portion of the transmission path between 
    the wireless terminal (usually portable or mobile) and the active base 
    station or access point.
    2) 
    The 
    air interface is the shared boundary between a wireless 
    terminal and 
    the base station or access point.
     
    I am trying 
    to avoid using air-interface interface, and I believe that 2 in essence is 
    taking a look at the "cross section" of the air interface between the mobile 
    and base station. I have paraphrased definition one to remove the term 
    "circuit" and replace it with the more generic "transmission path" due to 
    the potential connectionless packet nature of the path. 
     
    The 
    intro/preamble to the actual standard could then read eg:
     
    This standard 
    specifies the layer 1 and layer 2 protocols of the air-interface between 
    compliant wireless terminals and base stations. (English to be fixed and 
    polished when we get there).
     
    In the 
    requirements document we can put a similar statement in the overview. Note 
    that the discussion as to whether we indicate what layer a requirement 
    applies to is a separate issue. 
     
    This is in 
    line with IEEE standards, 3G standards and ISO standards that all use the 
    term air interface in a similar manner.
     
    Sorry about 
    this somewhat lengthy epistle. I hope it helps in getting us towards 
    closure.
     
    Mark
     
     
    -----Original 
    Message-----
From: Jim 
    Mollenauer [mailto:jmollenauer@technicalstrategy.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, 
    October 08, 2003 
    3:04 
    PM
To: Geoff Anderson
Cc: 'Gang Wu'; 
    stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
Subject: Re: stds-80220-requirements: 
    Definition of "air interface"
     
    I respectfully 
    disagree.  A protocol and an interface are not the same thing.  A 
    protocol specifies what happens when, and generally involves several 
    information transfers across one or more interfaces.  An interface is 
    the boundary between two entities, across which information may flow 
    according to some protocol.
The term "air interface" emphasizes that 
    we are standardizing the information flow through the air between two 
    systems, and not across some internal wired interface within one of the 
    systems.  Calling it a "radio link" is confusing: does that imply link 
    layer or physical layer?
Let's keep "air interface".
Jim 
    Mollenauer
Geoff Anderson wrote:
    I 
    think Jim Tomcik had discussed a term Radio Link Protocol, or RLP during the 
    San 
    Francisco meeting. 
     After replacing Air Link with Radio Link or Radio Link Protocol in the 
    document and then re-reading, it seems to make much more 
    sense.
     
    I 
    would agree with Alan's 10/2 proposal to remove Air Interface and replace 
    with Radio Link or Radio Link Protocol where it makes sense.  Also this 
    decision would carry forward to all documents of 802.20, as Alan 
    proposed.
     
    geoff
     
    
    Geoffrey T. 
    Anderson 
    45 Roe 
    Avenue
    Cornwall on 
    Hudson, 
    NY  
    12520-1403
     
    Phone:  845-534-4589
    Fax:      845-818-3513
    Cell:      914-843-9572
 
    -----Original 
    Message-----
From: owner-stds-80220-requirements@majordomo.ieee.org 
    [mailto:owner-stds-80220-requirements@majordomo.ieee.org] 
    On Behalf Of Gang 
    Wu
Sent: 
    Thursday, October 02, 
    2003 2:33 
    PM
To: stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
Subject: stds-80220-requirements: 
    Definition of "air interface"
     
    
    At least I found one 
    from the web.
 
    
    
    "In cellular telephone 
    communications, the air interface is the radio-frequency portion of the 
    circuit between the cellular phone set or wireless modem (usually portable 
    or mobile) and the active base station."