| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | 
| Yair, Sorry for being late in answering your 
questions: Type testing requirements for communication networks 
and systems in substations are described in IEC 61850 Part 3: General 
requirements. Clause 5.7 handles the environmental conditions for EMI 
immunity including conducted disturbances/surges (5.7.1.2): Surges as per IEC 61000-4-5 (test levels to class 
4) with waveforms 1,2/50 µs and 10/700 µs and peaks up to 4 
kV. Conditions to be met (5.7.4.2): The equipment shall be considered to have passed 
the tests if - during, or as a result of, the tests - all of the following 
conditions are met for the equipment and the connected 
devices: 
 With best 
regards, From: Darshan, Yair [mailto:YDarshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Donnerstag, 19. Juli 2012 08:52 To: Winkel, Ludwig; STDS-802-3-RTPGE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [802.3_RTPGE] Fw: [802.3_RTPGE] PoE ad hoc - new information Hi 
Ludwig, Thanks for 
the info. Few 
questions: 1.      
How the 4KV surge on signal lines is 
applied? Through capacitive clamp other contact? On each wire separately 
relative to chassis? 2.      
What do you mean by "PoE channels will be 
treated like non-PoE channels"? Thanks Yair Darshan 
Yair Chair Power 
over HDBaseT Subcommittee  HDBaseT 
Alliance Chief R&D 
Engineer Analog 
Mixed Signal Group Microsemi 
Corporation 1 
Hanagar St., P.O. Box 7220 Cell: 
+972-54-4893019 E-mail: <mailto:ydarshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>.   From: Winkel, Ludwig 
[mailto:ludwig.winkel@xxxxxxxxxxx]  Dave et 
al,   The 
requirements from Industrial Automation according the question list 
FYI: 1. Is 
PoE as defined in Clause 33 of the current standard adequate for 
RTPGE? Yes, IEEE 
802.3at is adequate in principle, some additional requirements 
exist: 
 The EEE 
for industrial automation is done by using a higher layer protocol for 
Device-shut-down, not by switch off the power. With 
that we can daisy chaining the power to decouple the topology from the logical 
grouping of devices that can be switched off.       With 
best regards,   From: Dave Dwelley 
[mailto:ddwelley1@xxxxxxxxx]  All 
- Another 
clarification - discussion about a CFI in particular is out of scope in this 
meeting. Dave ----- 
Forwarded Message ----- All 
- A couple 
of clarifications: the meeting this afternoon is intended to address all PoE 
topics, not just RTPGE-focused topics. The goal is to decide whether it makes 
sense to hold a new CFI to address all PoE topics, including RTPGE, PoE++, and 
any other relevant PoE topics. Please invite anyone who can contribute (and is 
present in San Diego) who is not on the RTPGE 
reflector. The 
RTPGE meeting is expected to break around 2:30 today, so this PoE meeting will 
start immediately afterwards. Meet in the lobby outside Manchester 
D. 
 |