Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[802.3_SPEP2P] [802.3de] Revised first sentence of 99.1 - comment 39



I’ll kick this off with a comment I received privately (thanks Piers) that I agree with.  I didn’t want to churn the proposal too much, rather letting the group discuss and reach consensus.

Piers points out that the proposed rewrite says “point-to-point link” twice in the first sentence, which is redundant:


“This clause specifies an optional MAC Merge sublayer for use on a point-to-point link with a pair of MACs and a single PHY operating on a point-to-point link. The clause is applicable to full-duplex operation with 10BASE-T1L (Clause 146) and 10BASE-T1S (Clause 147) PHYs and all PHYs 100 Mb/s and above. It is also applicable to half-duplex point-to-point operation with the 10BASE-T1S (Clause 147) PHY, but operation with the 10BASE-T1S PHY in multidrop mode is not specified."

 

The base text was: “This clause specifies an optional MAC Merge sublayer for use with a pair of full-duplex MACs and a single PHY operating at 100 Mb/s or higher on a point-to-point link.”

He further suggests dropping out the first instance, so that the resolution reads more like the base text, and I would agree with that, so that it reads:

 

“This clause specifies an optional MAC Merge sublayer for use with a pair of MACs and a single PHY operating on a point-to-point link. The clause is applicable to full-duplex operation with 10BASE-T1L (Clause 146) and 10BASE-T1S (Clause 147) PHYs and all PHYs 100 Mb/s and above. It is also applicable to half-duplex point-to-point operation with the 10BASE-T1S (Clause 147) PHY, but operation with the 10BASE-T1S PHY in multidrop mode is not specified."

 

Thoughts appreciated (even if it is ‘I agree’)

-george


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-SPEP2P list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-SPEP2P&A=1