Re: [STDS-802-3-NGBIDI] Update to Comment #21

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Thread Links

Date Links

Thread Prev

To: STDS-802-3-NGBIDI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: [STDS-802-3-NGBIDI] Update to Comment #21

From: Yuanqiu Luo <yuanqiu.luo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 20:14:19 +0000

Accept-language: en-US

Arc-authentication-results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@Futurewei.com header.s=selector2 header.b=ZcC++YJt; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=futurewei.com dkim=pass dkdomain=futurewei.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=futurewei.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of yuanqiu.luo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx designates 40.107.244.109 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yuanqiu.luo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=futurewei.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=futurewei.com; dkim=pass header.d=futurewei.com; arc=none

Arc-message-signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=mime-version:content-language:accept-language:in-reply-to :references:message-id:date:thread-index:thread-topic:subject:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=Ot8kzMU0+0GLT11LaFwhJBZTXiV97P8vrla8yRtZPBA=; b=Vshc6LNHe9Y9b8JXkyUWSEljg6pkE9JSqGBF04ELlEj+hGTZcaoQ+r8IKfpReCAhvP DCfihiL5AjBMBllWgzdjft2/ExjaeXaH4Y814p4QsJlWTY/gkROeSOYfAGdJI88F0UEz sSfzITwSSQ2FzUiszaq3xaX9NdEtNwLtQjPSfgG9acBkYcn/iHM7v93O4cQ5GoYl+clP ZH8ltZzb8YQuFY5w6xOeAvNtmPNKqn9BAGnPbHRY9AroFD7n1/A+MkC3F8I+VimfinmK /tHCOVymdhNTWv5jW+2jtV84dKeOl4KMa++j/d92yDNv6PHzWdy4ITJ5gwKmAXHujyn/ Aoqg==

Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Ot8kzMU0+0GLT11LaFwhJBZTXiV97P8vrla8yRtZPBA=; b=JIl7E6xOyGuRjszdjx5sThckIkrwdNOKZlfUDokWNkfl+0evvU3p3KBcX90I4nVg5/NoaLQMHkrdlg0yJ8Tw3do0qVUGynf+HGqY5AdfSUxDfDtR+TXEcTUwnReodnmjO003TFeUIYV/Rzy3TlbKot5vi7Hmt+s8eSk0Q1m8aRdBhPk9V6hPcrH4BjJvkg9xM+1AyK3lANaTkrr++SXt6rDzuAcTVzIzt+poH7ziauS/izZvMLWVP/leNYF8NBNq4qoBcEWvzhkHVmqhfbS/rHArbwywBOq/8h5vAiNXicp0lK7e8RbMNqvAGombke6OfMOqZSrsSufdQ47ah8AwOw==

Arc-seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1602101666; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qDAF03vl6j4eY+2zYYknP27aRqI/6F7xFOJqVCUvwW4oF2+GbylnrsfX0MPx6XXdD2 oCF78GUfn+1Ot9HJmWMFXVMUDO/RQPwJPxXMSWduHsHi6qyCIRgpu1S77gcrsAuChkCE ZwVU0tz+Ocw7YOeIvCn4IauxiwRUVsFAS7RNbVC89gaJA7SOGsihVGHXC5FMdH+YnRF+ kzeIqWyH6peKxkRd8XvCAY9mLwbC2vpQ592X4sjSJl99vd9izPR2p9XM6XbBftM4epJe QVXLqOejtwCm4bGJIQAQRNH/kMEWrZznlKPqBaypbZx1Pn0XIwH4mVcYnp79u+hWHRgi avLA==

Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=YjbZM6TgB31huvGc6pmVnhQwSNqhRa1qA2R6++FflpwA490ckQqK3sdJT4a/6lhqgNUbovCYWCBgibPTzeDiApX9fovrONKEBSzBNCZvyvEDmIkC/MhrY0q72D2AD64/FUNCzCXN0g28Q8ahn6pc6ziMFrb43tWG8FnIH3MIcxVhYPjIOPsSOgtNW6Zf9I2+CrGpE+Yw9Vje8qKAigTZ23tESpOtyxVj/XrDM3ESYh/x05WvrTrqEs39NnXlS+9nKRqNgM4Vf6hMsZoENCBLIJ9mOYy80xXH1JpohAY4fBijSIKfED+dBXws4pJXn1wnBpL+iv/aTpjwC2zZ0fvfCg==

Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Delivered-to: STDS-802-3-NGBIDI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In-reply-to: <MN2PR13MB26537646A64840EDF2CBFC23FD0E0@MN2PR13MB2653.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>

List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-802-3-NGBIDI>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-802-3-NGBIDI>

List-owner: <mailto:STDS-802-3-NGBIDI-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>

List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-802-3-NGBIDI-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>

List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-802-3-NGBIDI-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>

References: <MN2PR13MB26537646A64840EDF2CBFC23FD0E0@MN2PR13MB2653.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>

Reply-to: Yuanqiu Luo <yuanqiu.luo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thread-index: AdaZIYARZsfI7j9SRJ+eG5fl0YIkhADxJqww

Thread-topic: Update to Comment #21

Dear All,

There is no negative feedback to this proposal. I will update Comment #21 resolution.

Thank you,

Yuanqiu

From: Yuanqiu Luo <yuanqiu.luo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 2, 2020 9:14 PM
To: STDS-802-3-NGBIDI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-3-NGBIDI] Update to Comment #21

Dear All,

When implementing resolution of Comment #52, we modify Clause 108 to include the XSBI interface to support 10GBASE-BR20 RS-FEC. One of such modifications is adding a new paragraph (in blue text) to 108.4 as follows:

108.4 Delay constraints

The maximum delay contributed by the 10GBASE-R RS-FEC sublayer (sum of transmit and receive delays at one end of the link) shall be no more than 24576 bit times (48 pause_quanta or 2457.6 ns). A description of overall system delay constraints and the definitions for bit times and pause_quanta can be found in 44.3.

The maximum delay contributed by the 25GBASE-R RS-FEC sublayer (sum of transmit and receive delays at one end of the link) shall be no more than 24576 bit times (48 pause_quanta or 983.04 ns). A description of overall system delay constraints and the definitions for bit times and pause_quanta can be found in 105.5.

The blue text is a better resolution to Comment #21. It follows the remedy suggested by Piers, and 2457.6ns is explicitly specified.

Below is D2.1 Comment #21 resolution from the September meeting.

In other words, Comment #52 resolution takes precedence over Comment #21. I would like to propose to update the resolution to Comment #21 as --- ACCEPT IN PRINCIPLE. See Comment#52. Add a new first paragraph to 108.4 “The maximum delay contributed by the 10GBASE-R RS-FEC sublayer (sum of transmit and receive delays at one end of the link) shall be no more than 24576 bit times (48 pause_quanta or 2457.6 ns). A description of overall system delay constraints and the definitions for bit times and pause_quanta can be found in 44.3”.

Please check this out and feed back to me by Tuesday, October 6^th.

Regards,

Yuanqiu

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-NGBIDI list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-NGBIDI&A=1