Re: Web-site updates
I can give a brief update on that. Maybe Raj should
since he is co-chair :)
mike
Khaled Amer wrote:
>
> Mike,
>
> We may also want to include some discussions about the IETF IPoPTR BOF.
> What do you think?
>
> Khaled Amer
> President, AmerNet
> Architecture Analysis and Performance Modeling Specialists
> Phone: (949)552-1114 13711 Solitaire Way, Irvine, CA 92620
> Fax: (949)552-1116 e-mail: khaledamer@xxxxxxx
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Takefman" <tak@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <stds-802-rprsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 7:46 PM
> Subject: Web-site updates
>
> >
> > RPRSGers,
> >
> > the email archive is now accessable from the
> > rprsg home page.
> >
> > the web-site is now up to date wrt to all of
> > the presentations given during the july interim.
> >
> > My apologies to Nader Vijeh and Harry Peng/Allan Pepper
> > for the late addition of their presentations.
> >
> > We are planning to meet on the 28th and 29th. There is
> > no firm agenda yet as I have had few requests for
> > slots. So here is what I propose we do, and during this
> > last week if there are requests for slots I will be
> > happy to allocate.
> >
> > The current PAR and 5 Criteria are there, we will
> > vote to approve these in San Jose after some discussion
> > (to my mind mostly around whether we want to say WAN
> > or be a little less forward and say extended MAN :)
> >
> > One action item was not completable by the
> > asignees (they apologized) so I think we can
> > try to whiteboard it (the MAC layering model).
> >
> > We saw some traffic on 802.1 D/F/Q. Since we were
> > looking for negative acknowledgements (i.e. shout
> > if there are problems) we could assume life is great.
> > So I am going to poll the people who signed up for
> > actions to give a quick answer in person at the meeting.
> >
> > We have had 1 request for presentations (Khaled).
> >
> > We have had a little discussion on Objectives so
> > I think we can white board it.
> >
> > We need to discuss T1X1 and their work in this
> > area and I think we need to draft a letter to them.
> > I sent out an email with their letter and saw no
> > response. I request people to look into the email
> > archive for the mail from me on Payload Independant
> > SONET MAC and follow the links and have an opinion.
> >
> > We can put together a press release, I'll have details
> > by then on what the process is. We did get a small
> > amount of press (which is a good thing)
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> > mike