Re: [802SEC] LMSC Rules Change Distribution and Ballot
My interpretation would be:
At the first meeting AFTER the change is fully approved
You evaluate membership by the new criteria.
I would think that "it would be reasonable" for us to come up with a
1) Make sure that the change is announced both by e-mail and at
all Interims immediately after it is approved. This would be a "warning" to
those "voters in peril".
2) Develop a "Voters in Peril" list and notify each on the list
that they need full attendance at the next plenary to retain their membership.
3) Make a "one time exception" that those whose voting rights have
been revoked by the policy are converted to "voters in peril" for the next
(My guess is that there will be very few who take us up on the one time
All of this would be appropriate to put in as a comment.
I hope this helps.
At 11:01 PM 9/15/2002 -0400, Mike Takefman wrote:
>since I am sure this will be asked by the membership.
>If this rules change is approved, when will it take
>i.e. as a WH chair, do I look at attendance from
>1) July to November
>2) November to March
>3) March to July.
>My first assumption would be 2)
>Michael Takefman email@example.com
>Manager of Engineering, Cisco Systems
>Chair IEEE 802.17 Stds WG
>2000 Innovation Dr, Ottawa, Canada, K2K 3E8
>voice: 613-254-3399 fax: 613-254-4867