Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Further comments on 11-20-0747-00-00be-rts-cts-in-11be?

[Yong Liu <yliu007@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Insun,

Sorry for the late reply.

The intention to add the puncturing information in MU-RTS and ehtCTS is the same as adding the BW information in the scrambler seed of RTS/CTS. 

For both cases, the transmitter wants to use a small packet (RTS / MU-RTS) to probe the dynamic BW and puncture information at the receiver side, before sending the long data PPDUs.

BSS operating BW with disallowed 20MHz channels is a bit long-term puncturing information, which may not be sufficient for the transmitter to gather the available channels at the receiver side for the immediate subsequent transmissions.

Please feel free to let me know if you have any further comment/concern.

Thanks,

Yong

 

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 6:30 PM 장인선 <insun.jang@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Yong

 

Thanks for the discussion

In fact, I have the same Q as Ming during the call, regarding the necessity of puncturing information in the special user info field of MU-RTS.

Because I thought we already have dynamic puncturing in PHY and BSS operating bandwidth with disallowed 20MHz channels (in 6GHz, SP#53).

I just wanted you to clarify the motivation of including the information

 

Thanks

Best Regards

Insun

 

From: Yong Liu [mailto:yliu007@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 11:05 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; insun.jang@xxxxxxx; younghoon.kwon@xxxxxxx; Kaiying Lu
Cc: yongliu; lochan_verma@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Further comments on 11-20-0747-00-00be-rts-cts-in-11be?

 

Hello Insun, Young Hoon, Kaiying, and Yanjun,

 

Due to time constraints, we were not able to answer you questions regarding our 11be RTS/CTS submission, during the 11be call last week.

Would you mind sharing with us your questions or comments over emails?

 

Thanks,

Yong

 

 

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1