Hi Bo,
Please add the following Straw Polls to the list.
Regards,
Steve
Straw Poll #1
- Do you agree to add following content to sub-clause 4 of SFD:
- IEEE 802.11bp will specify, in 2.4 GHz, an AMP Downlink PPDU containing at least an 802.11 preamble field, an AMP-Sync field and an AMP-Data field. Inclusion of an AMP-SIG
field is TBD.
- The details of the 802.11 preamble field are TBD.
- Additionally, for transmission to backscatter STAs there will be one or more Excitation fields
- Additionally, for transmission to backscatter STAs there may be more than one AMP-Data field
- Additionally, AMP-Sync and AMP-SIG field may precede each AMP-Data field
- Name of this Downlink PPDU is TBD.
- Yes
- No
- Abstain
Straw Poll #2
- Do you agree to add following content to sub-clause 4 of SFD:
- IEEE 802.11bp will specify an AMP Downlink PPDU with an AMP-Sync field with duration less than 64 µs
- The AMP-Sync field design is TBD.
- Note: the duration of the 802.11ba HDR Sync field is 64 µs
- Yes
- No
- Abstain
Straw Poll #3
- Do you agree to add following content to sub-clause 4 of SFD:
- The AMP Downlink PPDU AMP-Sync field and the AMP-Data field will use On-Off Keying (OOK) modulation
- Yes
- No
- Abstain
Straw Poll #4
- Do you agree to add following content to sub-clause 4 of SFD:
- The AMP Downlink PPDU AMP-Data field will use Manchester encoding for non-backscatter operation.
- For the Backscatter case, the AMP-Data field encoding scheme is TBD.
- Yes
- No
- Abstain
Straw Poll #5 (For Information Collection (Not for SFD))
- For the AMP Downlink PPDU evaluation simulations which multipath channel model should be used?
- Channel Model B
- Channel Model D
- Abstain
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBP list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBP&A=1
|